-
Easy to tell; I happened to listen to the 320kb/s one first and knew before I listened to the other one that it was high quality. Then again, I have studio monitors in here. Incidentally, for those of you who seem confused in your comments... both these files are MP3. One is the standard... more
Reviewed by JeraDarklighter Apr 02 2008, 05:41am ( 137 reviews ) • mp3ornot.com
- Showing 109 of 137
- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by Coheed on Mar 24 2008, 4:10pm
More proof that audiophiles are full of crap. It'd take a great set of headphones at least to be able to tell the difference. I listened to them with some high end speakers and still couldn't tell the difference. Really though, I don't know why it was so hard to tell the difference. I can completely tell if I'm listening to a 128kbps Mp3 in most instances, but I can't tell the difference between 160VBR and lossless.
-
Rated by CiscoMatisse on Mar 24 2008, 3:46pm
i can't hear any difference at all.
-
Rated by Zerotrick on Mar 24 2008, 3:45pm
If I was listening to an actual song, id be able to tell easier.
-
Rated by MechanicalMan on Mar 24 2008, 2:43pm
Wasn't too hard to tell which one was which, had to listen very carefully though.
-
Rated by Midnattsol on Mar 24 2008, 2:42pm
extremely obvious, now go add "c" = FLAC please (or 320 ogg vorbis if we want to keep it comparable)
-
Reviewed by ZodiakLucien on Mar 24 2008, 2:32pm
eh, wasnt that hard to tell.
-
Rated by UknowMyStEeZ on Mar 24 2008, 2:29pm
for real. i like this
-
Rated by TheCheat8988 on Mar 24 2008, 2:27pm
Maaaaaajor difference.
