-
Easy to tell; I happened to listen to the 320kb/s one first and knew before I listened to the other one that it was high quality. Then again, I have studio monitors in here. Incidentally, for those of you who seem confused in your comments... both these files are MP3. One is the standard... more
Reviewed by JeraDarklighter Apr 02 2008, 05:41am ( 137 reviews ) • mp3ornot.com
- Showing 109 of 137
- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by NintendoMan on Apr 20 2008, 3:27pm
I heard the difference on my laptop speakers....muhahahahahahahahahaha
-
Rated by Lokito on Apr 20 2008, 10:55am
mp3 as a format is of lower quality than almost any of its predecessor popular music formats. in b4 product. Audiophile formats: good vinyl, very wide tape (for the most part). NOT audiophile formats: sampled, sampled, sampled CDs (multiple formats) and mp3 files.
-
Rated by norteo on Apr 20 2008, 10:21am
o my god! I am deaf!
-
Reviewed by Zafer on Apr 19 2008, 7:58am
Although it's obvious from the loading screen, I couldn't tell the difference from hearing them. I hope it's just the crappy laptop speakers.
-
Rated by Prof-Chaos on Apr 18 2008, 7:57pm
nailed it.
-
Reviewed by wavelength1978 on Apr 18 2008, 2:30pm
had no clue, need better speakers I guess. Maybe if I put it on my iPod?
-
Reviewed by josie5003 on Apr 16 2008, 5:09pm
I pick it, nice sound even on my cheap speakers
-
Reviewed by 5x5x5x5x5 on Apr 16 2008, 12:11pm
okay. i thought they'd hide it better but it looked as if one clip took like twice as long to load... got it right right away. maybe i was biased towards the longer-loading clip, but i could hear artifacts in the faster-loading one .. on some really cheap-ass speakers.
