Kirk Cameron gives this as an argument to athiests (O'Reilly), but it really isn't. This type of thing is reinforcement, the reassurance of religious and conservative ideology in the people who already subscribe (I can imagine my Texan grandmother watching this without the edits and say...
I'm an atheist, but cutting in and out of that stupid interview, with the various slights etc only goes to show the creator of that video as being as narrow minded and cruel as o' reilly himself.
This video is a shining example of youtube editing. Kirk Cameron has this beautiful way of constructing an argument so as to sound flawlessly rational and scientific when he's disregarding rationality and science. He's got this charming ''Duh, any jackass can see there's a God.'' approach that gives me the giggles. He's a gem. Ray Comfort is even more of a gem though.
When religious people try to debate they need to understand science which for the most of them isn't possible. Dawkins is one of the top scientific intellectuals in the world while O'Reilly yells and screams when someone doesn't go his way. You don't have to know two shits about science to have a news show. A meteorologist is more educated than Bill is. Dawkins hands down beat O'Reilly and if he allowed him to speak he would of demolished each of Bill's so-called arguments or facts.
