-
From the page: "There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman"
Reviewed by umanor Apr 14 2008, 03:30pm ( 25 reviews ) • writersmugs.com
-
elspethelf7
elspeth...
813 Favs
-
manu12122000
manu121...
48 Favs
-
meol
meol
2,872 Favs
-
Ullsokk
Ullsokk
2,755 Favs
-
Polypythates
Polypyt...
18K Favs
Recently online -
sshatokh
sshatokh
43 Favs
-
fernandostyles
fernand...
138 Favs
-
pn67
pn67
4,518 Favs
-
rmg12
rmg12
4,983 Favs
Recently online -
RapidPour
RapidPour
3,876 Favs
- Showing 16 of 25

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by rmg12 on May 17, 5:13am
boss
-
Rated by billso on Oct 19 2008, 5:35pm
A little perspective never hurts.
-
Rated by fireforchrist on Apr 20 2008, 6:55am
From the page: "There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman" I have to laugh about this one
-
Rated by 11saga11 on Apr 16 2008, 12:06am
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
-
Rated by Tyrhaynes on Apr 15 2008, 5:19pm
From the page: "There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman"