Find other sites about
-
Founder of Greenpeace now supports nuclear energy. From the page: In the early 1970s when I helped found Greenpeace, I believed that nuclear energy was synonymous with nuclear holocaust, as did most of my compatriots. That's the conviction that inspired Greenpeace's first voyage... more
Reviewed by Inertial-Mass Apr 17 2006, 03:31pm ( 12 reviews ) • washingtonpost.com
-
quink
quink
2,181 Favs
-
Raven185
Raven185
6,274 Favs
Recently online -
Malvido
Malvido
7 Favs
-
Dylamaga
Dylamaga
504 Favs
-
ralreegorganon
ralreeg...
260 Favs
-
Heggs
Heggs
11K Favs
-
rvy
rvy
262 Favs
Recently online -
grouchogandhi
groucho...
1,638 Favs
-
toSAYtheLEAST
toSAYth...
233 Favs
-
Stevietheman
Steviet...
11K Favs
- Showing 10 of 12

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Reviewed by tahititreat on Jul 09, 9:13am
This is a very very interesting article by one of the founders of Greenpeace, explaining his thoughts on nuclear power and how his view has changed exponentially over the years as nuclear being a great alternative for creating environment friendly energy.
-
Rated by grouchogandhi on Apr 14 2008, 5:21pm
Greenpeace Co-Founder Off the Looney Bin Reservation: "Over the past 20 years, one of the simplest tools -- the machete -- has been used to kill more than a million people in Africa, far more than were killed in the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear bombings combined. What are car bombs made of? Diesel oil, fertilizer and cars. If we banned everything that can be used to kill people, we would never have harnessed fire."
-
Rated by elmomonster on Jan 08 2007, 9:18pm
water power has killed thousands, nuclear power plants have killed less than a hundred (Chernobyl being the sole incident, and an obsolete facility). I would rather be surrounded by nuclear plants than live a mile downstream from a large dam.
-
Rated by stephenhazel on Apr 18 2006, 8:06am
now are we SURE that hydroelectric is at capacity???
-
Rated by Inertial-Mass on Apr 17 2006, 3:31pm
Founder of Greenpeace now supports nuclear energy. From the page: In the early 1970s when I helped found Greenpeace, I believed that nuclear energy was synonymous with nuclear holocaust, as did most of my compatriots. That's the conviction that inspired Greenpeace's first voyage up the spectacular rocky northwest coast to protest the testing of U.S. hydrogen bombs in Alaska's Aleutian Islands. Thirty years on, my views have changed, and the rest of the environmental movement needs to update its views, too, because nuclear energy may just be the energy source that can save our planet from another possible disaster: catastrophic climate change.
-
Rated by pjd on Apr 16 2006, 5:34pm
Why nuclear power is a Really Good Idea. (According to Greenpeace, no less.)
-
Rated by toSAYtheLEAST on Apr 15 2006, 9:24pm
Nuclear power people. Whats more scary? Putting radioactive COAL emissions in the AIR we breath, OR putting radioactive in a safe secure container that will nevery cause any harm to anyone.