Website review: V i - C o n
cometakemyhand discovered this in Hacking
•18 reviews since Mar 29, 2008
hacking
•vi-con.net
People who like this website
- tyroiusrtmaonm
California
- FORCEDINDUCTN
California
- styleprominence
California
- jackernapes
California
- romesfaith
San Francisco
- overthought13
Phoenix
- izgir
Tempe
- Jmaster10000
Tucson
- ChelseaOslen
Elk Ridge
- Madman6510
Meridian
- BNX
Eugene
- firefly2
Eugene
- blacklotus90
Portland
- jstroh
Redmond
- dyingdreamer
Texas
StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests.
Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!
Reviews of this website
cometakemyhand discovered 5 months ago- birbirine aşık iki virüs..zarar vermek değil birbirlerini bulmak peşindeler..
- seventoes rated 13 days ago
- creative, but its VB... ewww...
- egrefen rated 2 weeks ago
- A cute (and real) story of two virii in love.
- BNX rated 3 weeks ago
- I'm not going to touch it, but I like the creativity of a friendly virus.
- FlameWarrior rated 5 months ago
- No. I hope these two are blocked on most anti-viruses.
- magicdot rated 5 months ago
- ======
..I don't fuckin' think so.. - ======
- M4nu rated 5 months ago
- vb-script kiddie tells about the feelings of his virus (which ist not 'harmless' because it wastes resources)
vi rustotal - vb-script kiddie tells about the feelings of his virus (which ist not 'harmless' because it wastes resources)
- romesfaith rated 5 months ago
- EvilBarney must be one of those "Gotta have all the newest Anti-Virus software" nuts whose computers are inconceivably slow because of them and thinks it's a virus. Anyway, interesting idea. I like how they move solitaire. That'd actually be a good thing for some people (when they try to play sol.exe from the start menu it doesn't work) so they have to get back to work!
- EvilBarney rated 5 months ago
- i don't want any potentially badly-written virus taking up resources on my pc, no matter how 'harmless' or 'cute' they are, especially since they a) take control of Outlook, and b) mess with the registry. how can the author guarantee that the code isn't buggy in such a way that it will cause harm? How can the author guarantee that the Outlook security settings that are disabled won't open holes in the user's system? etc..
Subscribe to updates