Website review: Proof at last: we are not all the s...

Someone discovered this in Genetics 18 reviews since Nov 23, 2006
icon tagsgenetics, racism thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php

Thumbs up People who like this website

misslisamichelle
Huntington Beach
josh1
Diamond Bar
Skewb
Irvine
distast
San Jacinto
Linchung
San Diego
kierkeg7
San Diego
fatdougie
Las Vegas
QuantumTimeSpace
Sacramento
Naphthos
Petaluma
jeffm666
Rohnert Park
343673
Santa Rosa
Zorch
Phoenix
Jabrar
Ukiah
hadidjah
Mckinleyville
zombie-milk
Seattle

StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests. Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!

Thumbs up Reviews of this website

TPeter rated 19 months ago
Interesting... but very difficult to evaluate for the lay-man (me). I don't see how this genetic argument necessarily translates to racism?
horatiocain rated 20 months ago
No citations? Pop-terminology? Holy shit, they call this a science magazine? The home page has some shit about celebrities. Look it's great to have an open mind - for new facts, not new junk science.
urgipig rated 20 months ago
dude... lemme see the paper at least.
ketemphor rated 20 months ago
Idiocy. DNA does not equal genes. Only about 1.5% of the 3 billion base pairs of the human genome code are exons (genes). So if there is 10% difference in that 1.5%, that's 0.15% difference which leaves a potential for 99.85% similarity in the DNA itself.
Jint3i rated 20 months ago
Thumbs up for rocking the boat.
evalobach rated 20 months ago
"Now an international team of scientists has analysed the DNA of people with ancestry in Europe, Africa, and Asia and found that individual humans differ in their genes by at least 10 per cent."
Hmmm.... but what does this really mean, a difference of 10 per cent? Some have blue eyes, some green, some grey and some have brown eyes? For what percentage do the various obvious differences in physical characteristics count?
This article is intriguing but superficial and doesn't tell us much. However, it would not surprise me if the DNA reflects the visible and invisible differences between people.
Zharkov rated 20 months ago
Maybe (surely?) i'm dumb, but i don't get it... Haven't been teached that between the champenzee and the human there were only something like less than a percentage of difference on the DNA? How come you can find so much difference only in one specie? Is the human specie that different? and be the way, scientifical article with no references is just a rumor, nothing more...
fromtheoven rated 20 months ago
Yeah, there are tons of differences genetically between races. Scientists use these different SNP's and LTR's for locating key genes that influence diseases. This is neither new nor all that suprising. What is bothersome is how the article is called 'proof at last', which seems to have a bigoted undertone. Genetic differences between races are highly useful, and sure they exist, but it certainly doesn't mean it's ok to step back into history and use this information to further seperate eachother. On the contrary, this information can help all human beings by finding the roots of diseases, and should be seen as a way to bring us together.
This page is not affiliated with thefirstpost.co.uk.