close

Discovered in

seitavw

seitavw
407 Favs

Find other sites about

Related Sites

  • How the Crash Will Reshape America - The Atlantic(March 2009)

    How the Crash Will Reshape America From the page: My father was a child of the Great Depression. Born in Newark, New Jersey, in 1921 to Italian immigrant parents, he experienced the economic crisis head-on. He took a job working in an eyeglass factory in the city's Ironbound section in... more

    Reviewed by aliasinkhorn Mar 02 2009, 08:01pm ( 9 reviews ) • theatlantic.com

    26 views
  • 8 reviews
  • Reviews of the site
  • Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review! default avatar

  • Rated by Perdo on Mar 20 2009, 12:00am

    The Atlantic Monthly is the best magazine I have ever read.

  • Reviewed by peteramckay on Mar 03 2009, 1:53pm

    In the Atlantic Monthly, author and professor Richard Florida details how he thinks certain U.S. regions will prosper or languish as the economy recovers from its current crisis.

  • Rated by aliasinkhorn on Mar 02 2009, 8:01pm

    How the Crash Will Reshape America From the page: My father was a child of the Great Depression. Born in Newark, New Jersey, in 1921 to Italian immigrant parents, he experienced the economic crisis head-on. He took a job working in an eyeglass factory in the city's Ironbound section in 1934, at age 13, combining his wages with those of his father, mother, and six siblings to make a single-family income. When I was growing up, he spoke often of his memories of breadlines, tent cities, and government-issued clothing. At Christmas, he would tell my brother and me how his parents, unable to afford new toys, had wrapped the same toy steam shovel, year after year, and placed it for him under the tree. In my extended family, my uncles occupied a pecking order based on who had grown up in the roughest economic circumstances. My Uncle Walter, who went on to earn a master's degree in chemical engineering and eventually became a senior executive at Colgate-Palmolive, came out on top--not because of his academic or career achievements, but because he grew up with the hardest lot. My father's experiences were broadly shared throughout the country. Although times were perhaps worst in the declining rural areas of the Dust Bowl, every region suffered, and the residents of small towns and big cities alike breathed in the same uncertainty and distress. The Great Depression was a national crisis--and in many ways a nationalizing event. The entire country, it seemed, tuned in to President Roosevelt's fireside chats. The current economic crisis is unlikely to result in the same kind of shared experience. To be sure, the economic contraction is causing pain just about everywhere. In October, less than a month after the financial markets began to melt down, Moody's Economy.com* published an assessment of recent economic activity within 381 U.S. metropolitan areas. Three hundred and two were already in deep recession, and 64 more were at risk. Only 15 areas were still expanding. Notable among them were the oil- and natural-resource-rich regions of Texas and Oklahoma, buoyed by energy prices that have since fallen; and the Greater Washington, D.C., region, where government bailouts, the nationalization of financial companies, and fiscal expansion are creating work for lawyers, lobbyists, political scientists, and government contractors. No place in the United States is likely to escape a long and deep recession. Nonetheless, as the crisis continues to spread outward from New York, through industrial centers like Detroit, and into the Sun Belt, it will undoubtedly settle much more heavily on some places than on others. Some cities and regions will eventually spring back stronger than before. Others may never come back at all. As the crisis deepens, it will permanently and profoundly alter the country's economic landscape. I believe it marks the end of a chapter in American economic history, and indeed, the end of a whole way of life ... Worthy of a critical read. .

  • Rated by thewordisberry on Mar 02 2009, 5:24pm

    Simply superb.

  • Reviewed by rodneyj43 on Mar 02 2009, 12:59pm

    One of the more striking things about this crash that this article alludes to is that the result will likely be that Wall Street will no longer be the global financial center. If the World Bank and the IMF become the new finacial centers for the world, the priorities for the global economy will be irrovocably changed for the better. From the page: "Global Crises and Economic Transformation "One thing seems probable to me," said Peer Steinbrück, the German finance minister, in September 2008. As a result of the crisis, "the United States will lose its status as the superpower of the global financial system." You don't have to strain too hard to see the financial crisis as the death knell for a debt-ridden, overconsuming, and underproducing American empire--the fall long prophesied by Paul Kennedy and others. Big international economic crises--the crash of 1873, the Great Depression--have a way of upending the geopolitical order, and hastening the fall of old powers and the rise of new ones. In The Post-American World (published some months before the Wall Street meltdown), Fareed Zakaria argued that modern history's third great power shift was already upon us--the rise of the West in the 15th century and the rise of America in the 19th century being the two previous sea changes. But Zakaria added that this transition is defined less by American decline than by "the rise of the rest." We're to look forward to a world economy, he wrote, "defined and directed from many places and by many peoples." That's surely true. Yet the course of events since Steinbrück's remarks should give pause to those who believe the mantle of global leadership will soon be passed. The crisis has exposed deep structural problems, not just in the U.S. but worldwide. Europe's model of banking has proved no more resilient than America's, and China has shown that it remains every bit the codependent partner of the United States. The Dow, down more than a third last year, was actually among the world's better-performing stock-market indices. Foreign capital has flooded into the U.S., which apparently remains a safe haven, at least for now, in uncertain times. It is possible that the United States will enter a period of accelerating relative decline in the coming years, though that's hardly a foregone conclusion--a subject I'll return to later. What's more certain is that the recession, particularly if it turns out to be as long and deep as many now fear, will accelerate the rise and fall of specific places within the U.S.--and reverse the fortunes of other cities and regions. By what they destroy, what they leave standing, what responses they catalyze, and what space they clear for new growth, most big economic shocks ultimately leave the economic landscape transformed. Some of these transformations occur faster and more violently than others. The period after the Great Depression saw the slow but inexorable rise of the suburbs. The economic malaise of the 1970s, on the other hand, found its embodiment in the vertiginous fall of older industrial cities of the Rust Belt, followed by an explosion of growth in the Sun Belt. The historian Scott Reynolds Nelson has noted that in some respects, today's crisis most closely resembles the "Long Depression," which stretched, by one definition, from 1873 to 1896. It began as a banking crisis brought on by insolvent mortgages and complex financial instruments, and quickly spread to the real economy, leading to mass unemployment that reached 25 percent in New York. "

  • Rated by yobaba on Feb 15 2009, 8:02pm

    From the page: "The crash of 2008 continues to reverberate loudly nationwide - destroying jobs, bankrupting businesses, and displacing homeowners. But already, it has damaged some places much more severely than others. On the other side of the crisis, America's economic landscape will look very different than it does today. What fate will the coming years hold for New York, Charlotte, Detroit, Las Vegas? Will the suburbs be ineffably changed? Which cities and regions can come back strong? And which will never come back at all?" An interesting (if not self-indulgent) essay about "what happens next". While I do not completely agree with the author, this is a good read.

  • Rated by DoogieD on Feb 15 2009, 6:16pm

    How the Crash Will Reshape America The Stanford economist Paul Romer famously said, A crisis is a terrible thing to waste. The United States, whatever its flaws, has seldom wasted its crises in the past. On the contrary, it has used them, time and again, to reinvent itself, clearing away the old and making way for the new. Throughout U.S. history, adaptability has been perhaps the best and most quintessential of American attributes. Over the course of the 19th century's Long Depression, the country remade itself from an agricultural power into an industrial one. After the Great Depression, it discovered a new way of living, working, and producing, which contributed to an unprecedented period of mass prosperity. At critical moments, Americans have always looked forward, not back, and surprised the world with our resilience. Can we do it again?

  • Rated by burkinaboy on Feb 15 2009, 6:18am

    The crash of 2008 continues to reverberate loudly nationwide--destroying jobs, bankrupting businesses, and displacing homeowners. But already, it has damaged some places much more severely than others. On the other side of the crisis, America's economic landscape will look very different than it does today. What fate will the coming years hold for New York, Charlotte, Detroit, Las Vegas? Will the suburbs be ineffably changed? Which cities and regions can come back strong? And which will never come back at all?