-
Census data, people. They took quantitative statistics from county records and just created a pretty little interactive graph. The concept is not hard to understand. Do the numbers tell the full picture, no. Still, records dating from 1790 help us better understand US demographic information (and... more
Reviewed by beatlebuddha Mar 26 2009, 05:17pm ( 21 reviews ) • smith.edu
-
erinrussia
erinrussia
285 Favs
-
meguminosa
meguminosa
175 Favs
-
Nathaniel-Laiet
Nathani...
667 Favs
-
carnauser
carnauser
1,189 Favs
Recently online -
dgdfgfg
dgdfgfg
3,147 Favs
-
avjones
avjones
3,988 Favs
Recently online -
scarletnight
scarlet...
213 Favs
-
retiredactor
retired...
477 Favs
-
Skull-at-Home
Skull-a...
1,340 Favs
-
prosperspurius
prosper...
403 Favs
- Showing 12 of 21

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by PurposefulStride on Jul 09, 12:28pm
Lololo. What a lie. Nearly that entire area was covered with indigenous people.
-
Reviewed by ijuitri on Mar 31 2009, 4:14pm
does this look like the spread of a virus to anyone else?
-
Rated by rmtoads on Mar 26 2009, 8:17pm
Interesting.
-
Rated by beatlebuddha on Mar 26 2009, 5:17pm
Census data, people. They took quantitative statistics from county records and just created a pretty little interactive graph. The concept is not hard to understand. Do the numbers tell the full picture, no. Still, records dating from 1790 help us better understand US demographic information (and make neato interactive maps.)
-
Rated by shiftplus on Mar 26 2009, 5:09am
It's not b/s, because it's showing 'county' statistics: as far as I'm aware indigenous peoples didn't have 'counties'.
-
Rated by Newyork204 on Mar 24 2009, 6:24pm
Nice map but how exactly do they know where everyone lived at those points in time.