Find other sites about
-
blufindr
blufindr
2,472 Favs
-
Virgo-Paritura
Virgo-P...
5,023 Favs
Recently online -
polaroid
polaroid
811 Favs
-
stefxd
stefxd
327 Favs
Recently online -
annatreter
annatreter
1,776 Favs
-
pilcho
pilcho
1,951 Favs
-
flyingsuitcase
flyings...
21 Favs
-
Bana-nana
Bana-nana
1,014 Favs
-
skojjatlu
skojjatlu
1,880 Favs
-
deepak1uw
deepak1uw
54K Favs
- 5 reviews
- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by denharsh1 on Oct 06, 8:25pm
Life saver for non native English speaker like me
-
Rated by Whomadewho on Jun 21, 9:43am
I ran these comments through it "Eh, I guess if you wanted to use this for spell check that's not so bad, but never take writing advice from a program. I ran something I've been writing through it just to experiment, and it told me I should replace the word "portion" with "part" because the former is "too complex" for readability." and it didn't like portion as it is too complex...expected that. What is complex about portion and who is this aimed at? This makes spell check and grammar check in MS good.
-
Reviewed by CluelessHuman2 on Jun 21, 8:20am
I tried testing it with several horrible grammatical errors and it caught HOW many of them? Zero. "In an attempt to" is now "too complex" for this. Seriously?
-
Rated by zombietalk on Jun 21, 7:00am
Eh, I guess if you wanted to use this for spell check that's not so bad, but never take writing advice from a program. I ran something I've been writing through it just to experiment, and it told me I should replace the word "portion" with "part" because the former is "too complex" for readability.
-
Rated by astaristar on Jun 16, 11:03am
not helpful at all.
