Find other sites about
-
It is nice to finally see a site that isn't the cookie cutter "Scientists who were Atheists". I think this site is somewhat misleading as are the atheists lists as well. The Einstein section is a good example. Atheists claim Einstein because he said he didn't believe in a... more
Reviewed by Baldrin May 06 2009, 09:26am ( 47 reviews ) • pallayi.com
-
titronium
titronium
9,852 Favs
-
Silverlight3
Silverl...
1,376 Favs
-
Saspeirs
Saspeirs
43K Favs
-
hana333
hana333
532 Favs
-
lili88
lili88
997 Favs
Recently online -
doru55
doru55
3,572 Favs
-
AlucarDX
AlucarDX
56 Favs
-
timshows
timshows
26K Favs
-
JMPost
JMPost
661 Favs
-
nikomalteze
nikomal...
6,580 Favs
- Showing 35 of 47

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by edgofinsanity22 on Oct 27, 3:25pm
Einstein was agnostic, and certainly not Christian at most. He found the bible to be rubbish. Also, I find it more "arrogant" to think that everything was created for us, for humans. We aren't that special.
-
Reviewed by musclegirl on Jun 14, 10:36pm
Very interesting.........I encourage ALL hard core atheistic science followers to read about these great scientists and their conclusions.
-
Rated by SearchAndLearn on Jun 10, 11:37pm
Why Not, have a purpose milkayf? Science and religion shouldnt clash and they are valuable to each other. Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.- Einstein. Also, Einstein didnt exactly believe in religion. But he was in awe of how his world "is".
-
Rated by mikayf on Jun 02, 5:27pm
Whoa, AgingGothMom beat me to it! Yeah, so if these people all believed in your god, which they didn't, so what? Does that lend any validity to your arguments? No. Oh, and there's no reason for science and religion to clash - as long as religion doesn't try to make truth claims. What? Too late? Then they clash, and there is no reason to pretend that religious claims have any validity. There is no "why," there is no overarching purpose to the universe - and in particular *we* are obviously not the point of it all.
-
Rated by AgingGothMom on May 26, 2:59am
Pretty much flawed. But did you expect any different from someone pushing religious dogma? "Look at this! I can't be crazy if these people clung to the same imaginary friend as I do! See? Validate me!" Where are Frances Crick, James Watson, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Carl Sagan, Thomas Henry Huxley, Bill Nye, Marie Curie, just to name a few? Not on the list? Hm. Wonder why? Ah yes! They're not idiots!
-
Reviewed by austinmathews on May 18, 7:44pm
A good attempt, but this is fairly misleading. Einstein was at best a pantheist. He has stated in several letters that he does not believe in a personal "God", but simply he stands in awe at the universe itself, and derives religious experiences from it.
-
Reviewed by nihtwael on May 18, 7:16pm
No reason for God and science to clash. One's why, the other's how.
-
Rated by shawngil2581 on May 12 2009, 5:41pm
I thumbed up so I could get more stuff like this, but really, what's the point? For every quote given, especially for Einstein that seems to point to them being hard core believers, there's another portraying them as complete atheists.
-
Rated by Ingrid77 on May 10 2009, 11:51am
From the page: "Famous Scientists Who Believed in God"