Website review: Cheney Pushes the Boundaries - Aga...
rodneyj43 discovered this in Politics
•1 reviews since May 4, 2008
politics
•opednews.com/articles/opedne_rowan_wo_080504_...
People who like this website
StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests.
Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!
Reviews of this website
rodneyj43 discovered 2 months ago- Omission is arguably the biggest sin and we are all guilty when it comes to this administration's abuse of executive power. Congress should subpoena anyone they wish to question and justice dept. should back up those subpoenas. This isn't a McCarthy-style witchhunt, this is a constitutional challenge to the powers of the executive branch. What kind of example of a 'democracy' do we want to set if we just elect a dictator without oversight. What's next? a military coup? Is that what america is all about? Or is it about comfortably complacent consumers, and it matters not what is done to keep it that way? Cheney Pushes the Boundaries - Again From the page: "Cheney is now arguing that "Congress has no authority over the Vice President." This comes through his attorney, Kathryn Wheelbarger, in response to a request that David Addington (Cheney's former Chief of Staff and legal counsel) testify before Congress regarding Cheney's involvement in approving torture. This is certainly not the first time the White House has argued that staff are protected by Executive Privilege from testifying before Congress. In mid-July 2007, Bush extended the mantle of executive privilege to Josh Bolton and Harriet Miers who had been subpoenaed to testify regarding the dismissal of U.S. attorneys. At that time, it was argued that Bush had the right to deny Congress access to White House records, documents and staff. This is consistent with the Bush administration structuring of the President as a "Unitary Executive." This is essentially an argument that the President of the United States has the authority to act unilaterally and without the oversight of Congress. The administration has crafted these powers largely through the use of thousands of executive signing statements, and by usurping powers without response from the Congress. The clearest statement of this "authority" was issued in an executive signing statement appended to the "USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005" - signed into law March 9, 2006. ... Like the signing statements before and after it, the Congress did not challenge the administration on its overreaching grab for power. The Unitary Executive theory of the Presidency does not extend to the Vice President - at least not according to anything I have read. Therefore, for Cheney to argue that Congress has no authority over him is not legitimate even under that illegitimate theory. What this does represent is the further carving out of aristocratic powers by the administration. Apparently Cheney feels that not only should the President/King be unfettered with checks and balances, but so too should the Vice President / Heir Apparent. His refusal to allow Addington to testify is a furthering of his arguments that the Vice President's office is a "hybrid" and therefore unfettered by Congress. An argument he made in 2007 to avoid releasing classified documents to Congress last year. Last year, Congress voted to place both Bolton and Miers under contempt of Congress. As far as I know, that has had no consequences whatsoever. One assumes they will issue the same to Addington. The claims of freedom from Congressional or Judicial oversight are a stalling tactic at this point. With the lack of speed with which the Congress has progressed, it is a tactic that is likely to work. Unfortunately, the fact that the Bush administration has been able to effectively rewrite the powers of the presidency will pass on to the next president - and on into the future. It has done more than set a precedent of presidential hubris. It may well have carved away the balance of power. "
