-
Amazingly addictive and fun game. Knowing when to collaborate with co-players is key. Frustrating when the players on your "team" are still figuring out how a given level works and they screw it up for all of you (or Game Theory it incorrectly). Give it a shot.
Reviewed by Bradley Jan 10 2008, 02:17pm ( 387 reviews ) • nekogames.jp
-
Mediat0r
Mediat0r
108 Favs
-
lintelotiel
lintelo...
1,290 Favs
Recently online -
keidiarji
keidiarji
457 Favs
-
cettox
cettox
49 Favs
-
dasannachen
dasanna...
445 Favs
-
Inariele
Inariele
1,811 Favs
-
Flanagon360
Flanago...
1,923 Favs
-
safehands123
safehan...
1,087 Favs
-
Pitex
Pitex
303 Favs
-
WwalewW
WwalewW
1,863 Favs
- Showing 304 of 387

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by Gimpt on Oct 12, 5:50pm
That was fun. After a few tries I beat it with 108 points =)
-
Reviewed by easyinfojob on Sep 30, 8:06am
entertaining!
-
Rated by insyen on Sep 25, 3:01am
interesting
-
Rated by Mecobg on Sep 02, 3:01pm
This game is awesome!
-
Rated by Kikaro on Aug 25, 5:32am
100 points for the final pyramid, 1 point for every small pyramid you click
-
Rated by EthereaLily on Aug 16, 7:51pm
I remember playing and passing this game a long time ago, then trying and failing to remember its name. Glad I found it again. I passed with 100 points (I don't think you can get any more or less.) and (I believe) two cursors left.
-
Rated by BrianH1988 on Aug 09, 3:39pm
Very interesting concept. It reminds me in part of the video I saw of someone trying to do Kazio Super Mario World and showing all the possible iterations as they happened in prior games. I would love to see puzzle games with set solutions such as Karoshi implementing an at least somewhat similar version to what's being done here, in the aspect of being able to directly see what you did wrong the last few times and then improving on your end result based on what happened before. Or perhaps just the parts that got you the furthest, to cut out the riff-raff in more difficult games. It would be particularly useful in harder FPS games, such as Half Life 2, where the AI tends to act in a set manner towards what you do, or at least to an extent responds to how you work with what you have. Non-laser mice will do horrible at this, since the old trackballs always seemed to work far less efficiently (mostly due to their added weight because of the track ball). I use a Logitech wireless mouse. Honestly, it's not necessarily the quality of the mouse that ensures how well you play, but how well you have the speed and set towards how you use it. Some people prefer to set the speed slower, but this tires the muscles faster and effects heavily how far you will get. The truth is that you need to find, much like anything else in life, a balance between efficiency (making the amount of effort needed to get the mouse from point a to b lesser) and precision (making the amount of effort needed to get the mouse from point a to b greater). I honestly find that using a laptop with a 1440 x 900 display (or my desktop with the same resolution, for that matter), I work best with these kinds of things with the mouse speed set 1 setting lower than the highest, and can maintain decent precision without having to move my mouse more than an inch from the center to get to either side of the screen (though it may help if I adjust that due to the smaller window size of the game) horizontally. Of course, that's simple due to the fact that on either setup, I really don't have a plethora of space to work with (on my laptop table, it's less than half a foot of space when I have the laptop at the very edge of it, though I have far more leeway vertically).
-
Rated by speedblader03 on Jun 18, 5:25pm
I used 7 cursors and got 100 points. What did everyone else get?