Website review: Map 8 - Slave States
homieduck discovered this in Politics
•23 reviews since Nov 30, 2007
politics, bush
•lukecole.com/Electoral%20Maps/Maps8.htm
People who like this website
- wastemytime
Hollywood
- RyanTooth
Simi Valley
- d0n7bl1nk
Mission Viejo
- drinkduffbeer
San Diego
- BackwardEducatio
California
- iriegal
California
- ezeisberg
San Francisco
- greenbodie
San Francisco
- Mattwick
Salem
- steddave
Salem
StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests.
Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!
Reviews of this website
homieduck discovered 7 months ago- Comparison of slave states and Bush states
- perrymason rated 7 months ago
- just like the voter iq thing, this is a joke.
im actually glad to see other people thumbing this down. - just like the voter iq thing, this is a joke.
- AlanEstrada rated 7 months ago
- Explain New Mexico, Indiana, Idaho, or Iowa please.
- olegnep rated 7 months ago
- just more proof that i live right in the middle of dumbfuckistan
- neuropsychguy rated 7 months ago
- Ah, the old guilt by association logical fallacy. origin415: "stevelovejoy, over the years since Abe's time, the republican and dems switched, in his time republicans were liberal, dems conservative." That's not an entirely accurate way of putting it. The Republicans were federalists and Democrats were about state's rights. Sometime after Lincoln they switched, with Republicans favoring small government and Democrats big government. Party alignment didn't have anything to do with "liberal" and "conservative" until this past century. It's also inaccurate to say to both parties are conservative now - both are quite liberal socially and fiscally. There is a slight trend towards social conservatism in both parties (Republicans are mostly socially conservative but there is a trend to become even more conservative) now but that's just because an election is coming up.
- BackwardEducatio rated 7 months ago
- "The democrats are the party of slavery," Correct. "and the Republicans were formed because they were against slavery" Very incorrect.
- anaxchronistic rated 7 months ago
- Not neccessarily saying that present day republicans would vote for slavery. More that had the republicans of today (taking into consideration that the abolitionists and anti slavers of then were republicans, but then also the switch in political parties since then) been around, they would have been many of the people who voted to keep slavery during the antebellum period. It's not insulting, it's just regional politics.
- edgeoforever rated 7 months ago
- Florida really voted for kerry - so did Ohio and probably a few more. This is a double fallacy - working with falsified election "results"and inaccurate historical data
- popwireless rated 7 months ago
- This is not historically accurate. This page is a convenient and socially hysterical re-write of history. A significant part of Southern California was sympathetic to the Confederacy. The association of then and now as somehow meaningful is just more irrational left-wing Bush hatred. There's a TV program for these folks now where the children have better answers than the adults.
