Find other sites about
-
From the page: "People who hear about this suit will have a sour taste in their mouth about Rowling from now on. Her Cinderella story once charmed us. Her greedy evil-witch behavior now disgusts us. And her next book will be perceived as the work of that evil witch. It's like her... more
Reviewed by DoctorSkot May 04 2008, 04:20pm ( 122 reviews ) • linearpublishing.com
-
Rukt
Rukt
4,310 Favs
-
karandos
karandos
11K Favs
-
JennJenn8
JennJenn8
3,279 Favs
Recently online -
Wired2k7
Wired2k7
5,350 Favs
-
kylewarren
kylewarren
2,473 Favs
-
abbyalger
abbyalger
786 Favs
-
whitephran
whitephran
598 Favs
-
theogen
theogen
78 Favs
-
emazingemmet
emazing...
6,046 Favs
-
LoggieB
LoggieB
1,393 Favs
- Showing 94 of 122

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by LateElf on Sep 09, 9:17pm
Love O.S.Card.. Love Ender's Game.. love reading a writer who's talking about something and doing so while making sense.
-
Rated by cindymuggs on Jun 28, 6:24pm
But this is the same tool who praises "Twilight" :/
-
Rated by cambionr on Apr 28 2009, 7:55pm
As I've always said, everybody plagiarizes Shakespeare, he stole continually from the Bible, and I've heard rumors that it might have adapted parts of the Epic of Gilgamesh. Only thing is, you can't have it both ways. You can't borrow from everywhere (especially from Gaimen) and then try to crush anyone who borrows from you.
-
Rated by flav0rc0untry on Mar 04 2009, 3:20am
If he wasn't such a homophobe I might actually care.
-
Rated by ribcaged on Feb 23 2009, 7:57am
J.K. Rowling, Lexicon and Oz! This is definitely interesting.
-
Rated by mikegreaves1 on Feb 06 2009, 10:17pm
very well said
-
Rated by Peacharina on Nov 13 2008, 6:50am
Larry Potter was not the hero in the Stouffer book you were speaking of, so the article lost all credibility. That said character was part of a separate short activity book unrelated to the one about Muggles. Also, to point out, in Stouffers book--the Muggles were tiny alien like people opposed to Rowlings term for non-magical people. I'm not going to reserve judgment on Rowling because I honestly loved the Harry Potter series, but as for whoever wrote this--I'd be more willing to listen if you had written facts and not rumors. Cheers!
-
Reviewed by Leadan on Nov 13 2008, 6:44am
Can everybody just admit that there is little real creativity left in any new commercial fiction and get on with life? Face it: there will be similarities between just about anything you read and something else that you've read. Some are more blatant than others, true, but the Harry Potter series induced an incredible amount of people to read, people who would otherwise have been sitting on their asses watching tv. Of course, now they can do both with the same materiel, but I digress.