close

Discovered in

aliasinkhorn

aliasinkhorn
34K Favs
Recently online

Find other sites about

Related Sites

  • Will gay rights trample religious freedom? - Los Angeles Times

    The New Left does not want to co-exist with other attitudes, beliefs, or opinions. In deed, the New Left hates existence other than itself. It doesn't kill opposition like Fascism did with its ideology that couldn't truck the existence of anything else different. It kills with Law and... more

    Reviewed by aliasinkhorn Jun 18 2008, 09:52pm ( 4 reviews ) • latimes.com

    320 views
  • 3 reviews
  • Reviews of the site
  • Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review! default avatar

  • Rated by seasandcakes on Jun 19 2008, 3:50am

    Let me sum up this story and reviews here...So it happened that one day Jesus was walking around in the desert, and he came upon a leper. "I am the son of God and I will heal you," said Jesus."Kick ass," said the leper. "If you can put my lips back on my face, I'll blow you in return.""What the fuck?" said Jesus. "You're a faggot? Oh man, I don't think I'm going to be able to help you out.""Naw, it's cool," said the leper, "I don't have to suck you off or nothing, just make me better.""But dude," Jesus said, "I already know you're queer and are going to use the lips and penis I give you to have gay sex with other men. It's in the Bible that that's wrong, and even though God's my dad and he never mentioned that to me, I read that he told some shepherd a while back. Anyways, I hope you respect my beliefs."

  • Rated by Lovefro on Jun 18 2008, 11:43pm

    The new left? what is the old left? the Democratic party that fostered such as strom Thurman? ok lets see "A San Diego County fertility doctor was sued for refusing to perform artificial insemination for one partner of a lesbian couple for religious reasons. The doctor referred the patient to a colleague, promised there would be no extra cost and offered to care for her during her subsequent pregnancy. The case is now before the California Supreme Court, and justices seemed hostile to the doctor's defense during oral arguments last month."... how is letting two people who love each other have a baby against someones religion? why is the doctor bringing his religion into his professional life religion does not equate ethics what if presidents all brought there religion into policy making the Doctor should be allowed to practice any religion he wants to but he dosent have to insult burden a these people with his religion and really what makes me most steamed is the "Lutheran school in Riverside County was sued in 2005 under California's Unruh Act (which forbids discrimination by businesses) for expelling two students who allegedly were having a lesbian relationship" if these kids are having there relation ship under the same rules that streaght kids have and are treated Farly why the hell where they expelled this is the school acting as a big brother into there personal lives and ostracizing and otheriong them then kicking them out of high school for doing nothing but being 2 teenagers how horrible is that? Some times the public schools SUCK where you live and the only way to get a decent education is a religious school and about the not being able to wear t-shirts how could the school allow the t-shirts that could be potentially damaging to other students? what if they wanted to wear anti-semantic slogans? racial slogans? how is there a difference?

  • Rated by aliasinkhorn on Jun 18 2008, 9:52pm

    The New Left does not want to co-exist with other attitudes, beliefs, or opinions. In deed, the New Left hates existence other than itself. It doesn't kill opposition like Fascism did with its ideology that couldn't truck the existence of anything else different. It kills with Law and Politics, formidable henchmen, in much the same way Fascist Germany did doing many cruel things. With such a weapon, the New Left, in a novel way, makes the living dead. The courts are accomplices just as they were in the times of Fascism. And under the pretext of the rule of law and neutral judicial judgement, they destroy like pathogens. And both now deny the separation of Church and State in terms the Old Left would have never agreed with. Will gay rights trample religious freedom? - Los Angeles Times From the page: * A San Diego County fertility doctor was sued for refusing to perform artificial insemination for one partner of a lesbian couple for religious reasons. The doctor referred the patient to a colleague, promised there would be no extra cost and offered to care for her during her subsequent pregnancy. The case is now before the California Supreme Court, and justices seemed hostile to the doctor's defense during oral arguments last month. * Catholic Charities in Boston and San Francisco ended adoption services altogether rather than be compelled by anti-discrimination laws to place children with same-sex couples. In the Boston case, Catholic Charities was prepared to refer same-sex couples seeking to adopt to other providers, but that was not sufficient. * A Lutheran school in Riverside County was sued in 2005 under California's Unruh Act (which forbids discrimination by businesses) for expelling two students who allegedly were having a lesbian relationship, in contravention of the religious views of the school. The case was thrown out in Superior Court in January, but the students have appealed. * Public school officials in Poway, Calif., so far have successfully barred students from wearing T-shirts that register their opposition to homosexuality on campus. One lawsuit made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court before being dismissed (as moot, because the students had graduated), but another federal lawsuit is pending. In each of these cases, and other similar ones, the government has acted in some way to forbid gays and lesbians from being demeaned. But allowing same-sex couples to force religious individuals or organizations to act out of accord with their faith is not cost-free either. Their dignity is no less affected. Unless claims rooted in equal protection under the law are to sweep away claims rooted in freedom of religion, a more sensitive balancing approach is essential.