Website review: Iran Body Count
Brightwarrior discovered this in Middle East
•7 reviews since Feb 11, 2007
middle-east
•iranbodycount.org/analysis/
People who like this website
- fuzznutz101
Los Angeles
- sparker911
Inland Empire
- nfactor13
Corona
- empirescrumble
San Diego
- sfcpointer
Clovis Ca
- sam313
San Jose
- EddieStarr
Sacramento
- aweedman
San Francisco
- redtrkdriver
Boise
- silaspaul
Portland
StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests.
Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!
Reviews of this website
Brightwarrior discovered 15 months ago- The probable results of conflict by Israel or the US with Iran.
- fire75034 rated 10 months ago
- And the unlikely results is freedom, Stability, and the ability to win a war.
- kayakchick rated 10 months ago
- Thank you for this.
- fbwl0212 rated 11 months ago
- Americans should just piss off trying to suck the oil out of "thid world countries" as they like to say. It's all about the oil, nothing else. Not about innocent human life, peace, just the oil and the Americans won't stop till' they get what they came for. It's so sad to see now that the Americans are trying to make Iran look like they are planning to make nuclear bombs, when they are in fact actually making neclear energy for electricity. I'm sick of them spreading propraganda about countries which they do not know what's happening in them, at all. I hope that this American President Bush gets elected off, and never voted for again, also to have more choices in election instead of just two canidates!
- SleepingFox rated 11 months ago
- Excellent stumble..You are to be commended, Brightwarrior. Incidentally: you are indeed a "bright warrior." From the page: "This briefing paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the likely nature of US or Israeli military action that would be intended to disable Iran's nuclear capabilities. It outlines both the immediate consequences in terms of loss of human life, facilities and infrastructure, and also the likely Iranian responses, which would be extensive."
- berrypicker rated 12 months ago
- "This briefing paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the likely nature of US or Israeli military action that would be intended to disable Iran's nuclear capabilities. It outlines both the immediate consequences in terms of loss of human life, facilities and infrastructure, and also the likely Iranian responses, which would be extensive"
- steviechuck rated 13 months ago
- "It is also possible that a paramilitary movement could develop from within Iraq. While there is abundant evidence of the unpopularity of the Saddam Hussein regime, it is certainly possible that internal opposition to US occupation and the subsequent installing of a client regime would result in an evolving insurgency. Internal opposition to the current regime does not equate with the future acceptance of foreign occupation." Seem that the authors of the Iraq report had access to better intelligence than CIA, NSA, DIA etc. Or maybe they didn't.
- wareq rated 15 months ago
- Short version:
The USA can't afford (in terms of financial and human resources) to attack, much less invade.
Israel can't afford to let America attack or invade.
The world can't afford to let America go crazier and choke off more oil flow.
We can't expect the Bushites to get it right this time either. - Short version:
- nooner rated 15 months ago
- Thanks for this akapearlofagirl. From the page: "Executive Summary An air attack on Iran by Israeli or US forces would be aimed at setting back Iran's nuclear programme by at least five years. A ground offensive by the United States to terminate the regime is not feasible given other commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan, and would not be attempted. An air attack would involve the systematic destruction of research, development, support and training centres for nuclear and missile programmes and the killing of as many technically competent people as possible. A US attack, which would be larger than anything Israel could mount, would also involve comprehensive destruction of Iranian air defence capabilities and attacks designed to pre-empt Iranian retaliation. This would require destruction of Iranian Revolutionary Guard facilities close to Iraq and of regular or irregular naval forces that could disrupt Gulf oil transit routes. Although US or Israeli attacks would severely damage Iranian nuclear and missile programmes, Iran would have many methods of responding in the months and years that followed. These would include disruption of Gulf oil production and exports, in spite of US attempts at pre-emption, systematic support for insurgents in Iraq, and encouragement to associates in Southern Lebanon to stage attacks on Israel. There would be considerable national unity in Iran in the face of military action by the United States or Israel, including a revitalised Revolutionary Guard. One key response from Iran would be a determination to reconstruct a nuclear programme and develop it rapidly into a nuclear weapons capability, with this accompanied by withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty. This would require further attacks. A military operation against Iran would not, therefore, be a short-term matter but would set in motion a complex and long-lasting confrontation. It follows that military action should be firmly ruled out and alternative strategies developed."
