Website review: Secular Web: Atheism, Agnosticism, ...

Someone discovered this in Atheist/Agnostic 40 reviews since Jun 21, 2002
icon tagsatheist, atheism, religion infidels.org

Thumbs up People who like this website

vitiare
Hollywood
EvolutionRules
Valencia
albie34423
California
chuckkaplan
California
rondaleigh
Carson City
Bonnie5828
Phoenix
Scientia
Lower Hudson
ksknuth
Pueblo West
igotacat
Fort Collins
Ukobach
Texas

StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests. Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!

Thumbs up Reviews of this website

mindseye rated 4 weeks ago
from there header - 'A drop of reason in a pool of confusion' some recent articles on the site http://secweb.infidels.org/?kiosk=featuredArticles
anishpaul rated 8 weeks ago
This site will be useful as a library
Jackanapes rated 3 months ago
Attempts to Dilute the Definition of Atheism Since 1979 proponents of atheism have often been attempting to dilute the definition of atheism to mean a mere lack of belief there is a God or gods.[7] One of the reasons why some proponents of atheism have been attempting to dilute the definition of the term atheism is to shift the burden of proof regarding the existence of God. [7] In the article, Is Atheism Presumptuous?, atheist Jeffery Jay Lowder, a founder of Internet Infidels which is one of the principle websites for atheists, agnostics and skeptics on the internet, states that "I agree [with Copan] that anyone who claims, "God does not exist," must shoulder a burden of proof just as much as anyone who claims, "God exists." [7] In short, the attempt to redefine atheism is a merely an attempt to make no assertions so no facts need be offered.[7] The attempt to redefine atheism, however, is not in accordance with the standard definitions of atheism that encyclopedias of philosophy employ which is that atheism is a denial of the existence of God or gods.[8] [9] [7]
mr-sphincter rated 4 months ago
Religious people are gonna hate it. Why? Well, I've read some people who claimed that it's arrogant and self-centered to have such a site, but what about all the religious sites that try to sell their beliefs to you? What's the difference? If you counted the number of atheists sites to religious sites, atheists are still outnumberd by a factor of 100 to 1. If religious people can't deal with an atheist website that simply collects relevent literature on the subject, then they are just being crybabies. Deal with it. Anyway -- I realize that I haven't written much that's funny lately, so I'll finish off with this:(Q) What did Jesus say to the man who nailed the nails into him on the cross? (A) AGHHHHHHHHH!!! Mother-F***ER!!! OUUUUUUUUCH!!!
Scientia rated 6 months ago
This is the best website promoting a naturalistic world view that I've come across on the Net. They will even publish rebuttal articles. There are selections that are repetitious, and some of this in just self-indulgent arrogance. If you are a theist read Richard Carrier for a real challenge
briansapient rated 8 months ago
The weakness. The same wealth of information on infidels.org can be found at dozens of other sites.
overlordsquishy rated 13 months ago
A wealth of information by friendly knowledgeable people cover topics ranging from Church-State Separation to Theistic philosophy.
Day-Z rated 14 months ago
A comprehensive clearinghouse for all sorts of articles.
This page is not affiliated with infidels.org.