Find other sites about
-
From the page: "The point is this: Thousands of years ago when we were hunter-gatherers, we may have needed a bit of meat in our diets in times of scarcity, but we don't need it now. Says Dr. William C. Roberts, editor of the American Journal of Cardiology, "Although we think we... more
Reviewed by Lolaone Jun 15, 07:35am ( 36 reviews ) • huffingtonpost.com
- Showing 27 of 36
- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Reviewed by commerican on Sep 01, 6:28am
Hunams in the past were certainly omnivorous, and despite what the article suggests, we did evolve somewhat to eat meat, like when we cook it. That being said, it is erroneous to suggest we therefore must eat meat, as this is clearly not the case. It would make a tremendous difference if folks reduced their meat intake to one or two servings per week.
-
Reviewed by pepsigrama on Jun 22, 2:19am
Dr W.C. Roberts must know me from another lifetime and before my memory of him formed. I am one he can't speak for. I need meat!!
-
Rated by mopheadtarot on Jun 21, 7:14am
i cant believe people are actually offended by this...
-
Rated by DrSinePHD on Jun 16, 6:00pm
Ask an anthropologist how they found early protohuman remains. From the bones of prey animals. How did we EVOLVE from seasonal gatherers to HUNTER-gathers? The high protein marrow and brains of prey animals. The two first human inventions were stone tools and fire. Those sharp, tearing teeth in your mouth won't grind grain or make it easier to dig out tubers, nuts or berries. We eat meat for the simple reason it made us who we are. Go ahead and be a cow or a deer. We eat them. Would you prefer to be a Morlock or an Eloi?
-
Rated by clcallies on Jun 15, 12:11pm
This post makes the absurd claim that early man did not eat meat because live elephants were hard to cook. Completely ignores the fact that early humans ate the animals that were easy to catch and the meat was easy to eat. Like, insects, fish, turtles, shellfish, birds, eggs, etc....
-
Rated by Lolaone on Jun 15, 7:35am
From the page: "The point is this: Thousands of years ago when we were hunter-gatherers, we may have needed a bit of meat in our diets in times of scarcity, but we don't need it now. Says Dr. William C. Roberts, editor of the American Journal of Cardiology, "Although we think we are, and we act as if we are, human beings are not natural carnivores. When we kill animals to eat them, they end up killing us, because their flesh, which contains cholesterol and saturated fat, was never intended for human beings, who are natural herbivores."" I just knew it:)
-
Reviewed by osn2003 on Jun 15, 2:57am
Good site
-
Rated by Kazzandra on Jun 14, 3:02pm
We are not hunters by nature. Only with tools can we succeed to hunt. And therefore, we at least had to be that evolved to actually hunt animals. Before that, we were probably like any other mammal that eats what is easy to get at, animal or vegetable.I liked this article until the end, where it seemed to start pushing vegetarian eating. I say that as a a vegetarian myself. It should not be up to the article writer to draw conclusions for us. Sheesh.
-
Rated by electricfields on Jun 14, 11:53am
Man, a lot of peoples' discomfort toward the idea of not eating animals is really apparent every time the idea comes up. It's so funny how when people leave their comfort zone they often turn into raging morons in a way very similar to "I dirn't come furm no dang ol' monkey." I'd like to see you try to go kill and eat a living animal with no tools. Let's see how those vicious canines of yours work out for that, not to mention the disease that comes from eating uncooked meat. The simple fact is, whether we eat meat or not we definitely weren't meant to eat nearly as much as we do. That's why so many people are disgusting 300 pound embarrassments to humanity these days. Eat meat if you want. I don't really care. I think this article raises some fairly valid points, but it won't kill you. I agree with Kazzandra on this. Draw your own conclusions. Fuck the writer's.
