close
  •    Marina Hyde: Put enough cameras on the police and even the serially deferential wake up |    Comment is free |    The Guardian

    From the page: "If there is anything to feel optimistic about today, perhaps it is the hope that we are witnessing the flowering of an effective inverse surveillance society. Inverse surveillance is a branch of sousveillance, the term coined by University of Toronto professor Steve Mann, and... more

    Reviewed by iheartplants Apr 11 2009, 01:41am ( 3 reviews ) guardian.co.uk

  • 2 reviews
  • Reviews of the site
  • Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review! default avatar
  • Rated by charlesfrith on Apr 12 2009, 5:32am

    UK surveillance society
  • Rated by iheartplants on Apr 11 2009, 1:41am

    From the page: "If there is anything to feel optimistic about today, perhaps it is the hope that we are witnessing the flowering of an effective inverse surveillance society. Inverse surveillance is a branch of sousveillance, the term coined by University of Toronto professor Steve Mann, and it emphasises "watchful vigilance from underneath", by citizens, of those who survey and control them. Not that turning our cameras on those who train theirs on us is without risk. Indeed, one might judge it fairly miraculous that the man was not forcibly disarmed of his camera phone, given that it is now illegal to photograph police who may be engaged in activity connected to counterterrorism. And as we know, everything from escorting Beyoncé to parking on a double yellow while you nip in to Greggs for an iced bun can now be justified with that blight of a modern excuse - "security reasons"."