Find other sites about
-
Cool, but I'm not quite sure how you define "standard" in this sense. Also, why do you need so much on a phone?
Reviewed by adamp237 Jan 12 2009, 12:51am ( 58 reviews ) • gearlog.com
-
superseastallion
supers...
1,225 Favs
Recently online -
Antivirus08
Antivi...
3,354 Favs
-
johnskraldespand
johnsk...
645 Favs
-
titronium
titronium
9,853 Favs
-
Saspeirs
Saspeirs
61K Favs
-
Kiters
Kiters
12K Favs
-
Petedk
Petedk
7,160 Favs
-
Lolo1887
Lolo1887
20K Favs
Recently online -
griachae
griachae
26 Favs
-
nigelmara
nigelmara
98K Favs
- Showing 41 of 58

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by steelfrog on Oct 30, 6:31am
Drooooooool.
-
Reviewed by Kirro on Oct 12, 10:56am
Unless some new technology develops, we're not likely to see cards that reach the new 2 TB limit. I'd really rather see cheap 2 TB hard drives first.
-
Rated by valepert on Jun 12 2009, 5:18am
FAT sucks
-
Reviewed by dreamwalker007 on Feb 22 2009, 6:48pm
Many of the people reviewing this site are misunderstanding the article. This has nothing to do with an actual memory card. It's simply a announcing a specification that would allow for large amounts of memory. It's not an actual product. It's similar to the shift from "SD" to "SDHC" specifications.
-
Rated by TheNikko on Jan 18 2009, 1:06am
can this awesomeness be true?
-
Reviewed by FlameWarrior on Jan 17 2009, 8:13pm
I bet the cards will be fairly large. It's really just the new filesystem that you have to thank, and a bit of new circuitry.
-
Reviewed by TRENDKILL86 on Jan 13 2009, 9:01pm
PRO: Even cheaper media storage. CON: Do we really need this shit?