-
DorahX
DorahX
1,067 Favs
-
Cogs02
Cogs02
83 Favs
-
stepsfinder
stepsf...
4,505 Favs
-
raerean
raerean
1,076 Favs
-
Zimmith
Zimmith
4,215 Favs
-
tdb1065
tdb1065
3,966 Favs
-
angeleyes1961
angele...
165 Favs
-
knappster64
knapps...
486 Favs
-
johnnyrsbrother
johnny...
5,839 Favs
-
lalamosiah
lalamo...
14K Favs
- 1 review
- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Reviewed by traviscorbin on Dec 05, 3:01pm
Biased. Worse than biased it's full of half-truths and whole lies. I was enticed by the intro that said many atheists would enjoy the reading then turned off by the end of the intro that went into Christian make-believe facts. The bible is a reliable source for history? History isn't even a reliable source for history! This paper, as easy as it might be to skip through vs. the bible, is another piece trying to say that it's more likely that the bible is real than not. Which, sorry, is not the most reasonable assumption given the evidence at hand.
