Find other sites about
-
I like the animation and the idea of framing each concept in the language of the opposing side. I saw this more as art, not really judging based on it's scholarly merits (which is moot). Interesting piece nonetheless. I don't think the point was to teach or convince, at least... more
Reviewed by caramelkrazy Dec 14 2007, 01:29am ( 128 reviews ) • duelity.net
-
Fuzzka
Fuzzka
2,012 Favs
-
aidantheman
aidanth...
47 Favs
Recently online -
daokta
daokta
2,291 Favs
Recently online -
vastila
vastila
3,739 Favs
Recently online -
weltentdeckerin
weltent...
709 Favs
-
Jourik123
Jourik123
3,190 Favs
-
rekam1ezion
rekam1e...
490 Favs
-
bbj343
bbj343
9,559 Favs
-
Ugly-Wan
Ugly-Wan
2,513 Favs
-
5tumbl3d
5tumbl3d
257 Favs
- Showing 106 of 128

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by TheAnswers42Huh on Oct 28, 11:46pm
Weird and kind of funny. I was upset that the evolution portion claimed that life began on Earth as a result of preformed bacteria arriving on meteorites.
-
Reviewed by Colin-Andrews on Oct 20, 10:37pm
Nice video. Spoilt by narrators putting on fake British accents
-
Reviewed by JoeTheGreek on Oct 05, 5:24pm
This was a fantastic piece of video art. I really enjoyed it.
-
Reviewed by apodder on Aug 29, 6:07pm
Do you think they meant to misspell "duality"? Or is it a play on "duel"? I'm not bothering to watch it to see...
-
Rated by barryr666 on Aug 28, 6:09am
Creationism and evolution turned on their heads with each theory told from the opposite perspective; creationism, science based and evolution, religion based. And finally duality, which shows the two theories are not so different; just a slight difference in timescale.
-
Rated by Fidi on Aug 04, 1:21pm
The equivalency of ID to creationism has been spelled out much better on paper. With so many people confused as to the purpose of the films, I think they missed the mark.
-
Rated by TheSupremeCourt on Jul 29, 7:25am
An absolutely beautiful video. Neither issue is expanded upon enough to show the inherent differences, but if it helps nutcases realise that science has no religious agenda then I'm all for it. It also entirely expounds literal creationism (6 days is not 5 billion years) whilst wonderfully illustrating the more moderate theistic-evolutionism.
-
Reviewed by Cygnus1983 on Jul 28, 9:46pm
... kind of slow, and not much of substance really. pretty though!