Find other sites about
-
Just how unattainable these visions of beauty, that smile down at us benignly from bill board adverts, shop windows, newspapers, magazines, television programmes, cinema screens and just about every type of media you can think of are, was brought home to me by this website. It shows pictures of... more
Reviewed by Melanie3i Oct 22 2007, 03:32pm ( 274 reviews ) • digitalphotoshopretouching.com
-
TrickMorr
TrickMorr
731 Favs
-
paupaupau
paupaupau
237 Favs
-
givemeendorphin
givemee...
693 Favs
-
gatiiix
gatiiix
1,238 Favs
-
creativecube
creativ...
143 Favs
-
DanteRules
DanteRules
468 Favs
-
driagosh
driagosh
1,144 Favs
Recently online -
biglis
biglis
291 Favs
-
retrit
retrit
18K Favs
-
murnamoo
murnamoo
30 Favs
- Showing 225 of 274

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by kithic on Oct 30, 2:09pm
Great page on retouching. What is pretty nice about this specific page is that you can flip between untouched and retouched pictures as often as you like which really helps you see the very subtle changes they sometimes make. But seriously, most of these women looked SO much better in the not retouched picture!
-
Reviewed by mechanic65233 on Oct 19, 5:31pm
The wet chick looks stoned to me
-
Reviewed by resmc on Sep 27, 3:57pm
Daz, in the past most people rarely if ever got the opportunity to look at art. Nowadays it's very difficult to avoid seeing images of people who don't exist, created in order to sell crap. You're quite lucky you haven't the least bit understanding of the psychological effects of living with impossible standards of beauty & a society which sees certain people's appearance as their most important characteristic.
-
Rated by maxxbachman on Sep 25, 10:44pm
There is a really heated ongoing debate about how digitally adjusted images create unreachable standards (the perfect looking people we see technically don't exist). I have to agree, many young girls don't really know they're looking at a person that isn't even real, they just see the standard. daz436 had a great point here, since people came up with ways how to portrait something or someone, using either words or imagery, naturally, it was always questionable how precise/exaggerated these descriptions are. That's not an argument as for why it's okay to do this. I'm not saying this can't be done, but people should be more responsible, when they see this has a negative effect. In France, for example, it'll be a legal requirement soon to include a disclaimer about an image being digitally edited, which I think is a good step forward. Hopefully this law will pass and find its way to other countries. Also, most of these edits aren't really anything special.
-
Reviewed by hanspama on Sep 21, 10:48am
Some actually turn out for the worse after retouching, just look at 14. But it has to be fake nowadays, that's the only reality about it.
-
Rated by rattatooie on Sep 18, 4:27pm
I was starting to wonder what had happened to womens pores . . . then I stopped looking at these kind of images.
-
Rated by pvyasbuzz on Sep 16, 2:09am
"amazing retouching affects with photoshop"
-
Rated by CUITEEPIE on Sep 03, 11:12pm
NICE FASHION PHOTOGRAPHY