Website review: Debunking 911 Conpiracy Theories an...

Someone discovered this in Conspiracies 8 reviews since Aug 24, 2006
icon tagsconspiracies, 9-11, wtc-7 debunking911.com/pull.htm

Thumbs up People who like this website

uncle-chuck
Hollywood
Durger-King
California
Agley
Pullman
Cotita
Mexico
Kiddokat
Corinth
shinyribs
Austin
Marcus-Lycus
Austin
Dubhlainn
St Ann
nomar357
Illinois
tonynotreal
Louisville
Fatherof4
Raleigh
umbra1
DC
impliedconsent
Ottawa
cjalvino
Brooklyn
dlneto
Sao Paulo

StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests. Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!

Thumbs up Reviews of this website

AvangionQ rated 8 months ago
This would be the first and only time in history that a modern high-rise building would have collapsed upon its own footprint due to fire alone. What's puzzling to me is, why lie about it? The building was partially damaged by fire and debris, so it was decided to pull the building - no big deal, if they would have just come out and said as much ...
quintaldo rated 14 months ago
good article about WTC 7 This picture shows the damage done to WTC 7 by the fall of WTC 1&2.
devo100 rated 15 months ago
Interesting view on sept 11
The-Owl rated 19 months ago
Debunking 911 Conpiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - WTC 7 From the page: "Conspiracy theorists say World Trade Center 7 is the best proof for controlled demolition because it wasn't hit by airliners and only had a few fires. They also claim that there was a confession from the building owner who said he "pulled" it. But this is deceptive because while building 7 wasn't hit by an airliner, it was hit by the large perimeter columns of the Tower collapse. It was 400 ft away but the towers were more than 1300 ft tall. As the tower peeled open, it easily tilted over to reach building 7. Below is evidence showing that conspiracy theorists are wrong. As you can see from the graphic below, all the buildings just as far away from both towers as WTC7 were hit. The others were either very short buildings which didn't have to support a massive load above or had no fire. Only Building 7 had unfought fires and the massive load of 40 stories above them."
downtownCAIRO rated 19 months ago
'and we decided to 'Pull-it' reffers to extracting the firefighters? Nice try but really not very convincing... Better luck next time lads!
This page is not affiliated with debunking911.com.