Find other sites about
-
Curious Rules for Writers. Some amusing rules that seem to make no sense, but are grammatically correct.
Reviewed by pigeonoverlord Apr 26 2009, 10:13pm ( 37 reviews ) • curiouser.co.uk
-
realgonekid
realgon...
892 Favs
-
SuzyJA
SuzyJA
649 Favs
-
cPaos
cPaos
1,121 Favs
-
sugarrxbomb
sugarrx...
844 Favs
-
louloubell
louloubell
5,133 Favs
-
craigyboo
craigyboo
525 Favs
-
Michellita
Michellita
1,027 Favs
-
tinheadhc
tinheadhc
338 Favs
-
CPirkl
CPirkl
1,239 Favs
-
mozillalover
mozilla...
3,512 Favs
- Showing 30 of 37

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by ktymellow on Nov 03, 4:06pm
nice
-
Rated by ande1300 on Oct 23, 11:11pm
same for this. a little grin
-
Reviewed by c0rp533f4c3 on Oct 19, 10:23pm
I like the triangle at the bottom.
-
Reviewed by Simsfanatique on Sep 23, 8:47am
It was funny, so I won't thumb it down. However, it's important to remember that people don't, won't and never will -take that- talk formerly. So contractions- use away. And fragments can be used for emphasis and effect. Some rules are meant to be broken.
-
Rated by EmokittyRI on Sep 07, 3:03pm
Funny, though I didn't read it all. However, many of these 'rules' are quickly becoming archaic
-
Reviewed by Laogeodritt on Jul 02, 2:30pm
Yes, several of these are plain wrong, and there are no hard and fast rules in writing, but that's not why I'm thumbing this down. I think people are missing the point. As I see it, this piece is meant to be humorous through self-references, not informative. Some of these are rules are completely absurd (...unfortunately, a lot of said rules are also regularly taught in schools), but picking those rules and making a self-referential statement out of them brings out that absurdity as well. Thumbs down because it's old and the additional rules (relative to the version I'm used to) aren't as amusing and make it less funny overall.
-
Rated by kalaway on Jun 10, 9:33pm
Many of these are just wrong. Creative way to present them though. Oh crap a preposition!