-
From the page: "Special Agent Adams teaches statement analysis as part of interviewing and interrogation courses at the FBI Academy. " I like to read about this sort of stuff. The thing that really bothers me about it is that arrests and convictions can be based statements made... more
Reviewed by Iszabel Apr 26 2009, 11:28am ( 12 reviews ) • crimeandclues.com
-
ConspicuousNinja
Conspic...
1,397 Favs
-
angelicablue
angelic...
373 Favs
-
Mick-Taylor
Mick-Ta...
193 Favs
-
Dasleah
Dasleah
1,028 Favs
-
oliver948
oliver948
112 Favs
-
bottlefairyy
bottlef...
77 Favs
-
yontone
yontone
121 Favs
-
D-Zest
D-Zest
2,693 Favs
-
DanteRules
DanteRules
469 Favs
-
LaChilenita
LaChile...
14K Favs
- Showing 5 of 12

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by BluePeriphery on May 23, 5:16pm
Interesting, but I wonder how fallible it is
-
Rated by namratha on May 18, 2:31am
Very interesting. But then in most cases mentioned here, I did not feel anything was wrong. I do talk like the "suspects" in this article, i.e, without the "my/I" in each n every sentence n such... Does that mean I could be a possible suspect ??
-
Rated by Iszabel on Apr 26 2009, 11:28am
From the page: "Special Agent Adams teaches statement analysis as part of interviewing and interrogation courses at the FBI Academy. " I like to read about this sort of stuff. The thing that really bothers me about it is that arrests and convictions can be based statements made by suspects which are then interpreted subjectively. It is not an exact science. Everyone knows it's legal for the police to lie to a suspect during an interrogation. If you don't, now you do. Never speak to the police on a serious issue without an attorney present. The police are doing their job, and their job is to get an indictment and subsequent conviction. Being only human, they will and have made mistakes. Don't be one of them.
-
Rated by kellypollock on Apr 24 2009, 7:13am
world have nothing to say
-
Reviewed by Alcoolex on Apr 23 2009, 8:18am
Seems bullshity to me, as vocabulary and syntax can vary a lot. Deviating from the "norm", the norm according to whom ? Based on what data ?