Website review: Constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.txt
scix discovered this in Crime
•5 reviews since Sep 24, 2007
crime
•constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.txt
People who like this website

- xRobertx
High Desert

- fuckeng
California

- shtevetm
California

- Maddog2840
Las Vegas

- eb4life
Oakland

- skinflap
Sacramento

- mailers
Napa

- rocketdoc
Phoenix

- glasstacular
Humboldt

- barbslc
Utah
StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests.
Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!
Reviews of this website

scix discovered 10 months ago- From the page: "â€oeCitizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: â€oeWhere the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”"

- 608gpd rated 10 months ago
- Lol, just try it and see what happens to you.

Tyfus rated 10 months ago- From the page: "Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary. Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed."

- Renatapf rated 10 months ago
- When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified."