Website review: North Dakota Judge Gets it Wrong

Someone discovered this in Internet 15 reviews since Jan 17, 2008
icon tagsinternet, law circleid.com/posts/811611_david_ritz_court_sp...

Thumbs up People who like this website

EcclecticTeacher
Long Beach
TheGreatZarquon
Apple Valley
ryanf
California
ScottFree2600
San Francisco
Maximander
San Francisco
EddieStarr
Sacramento
Erithrius
Lagunitas
Fearthebait
Mesa
starcraft78cwal
Annapolis
chillami
Eagle Mountain

StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests. Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!

Thumbs up Reviews of this website

twitch3z rated 5 months ago
The owner of the blog seems like he's kind of a tool in the comments. No more from him, please.
KalChoedan rated 5 months ago
Wait, what? Make sure you read the comments.
User247328 rated 5 months ago
This is crazy! They shouldn't allow judges to rule in cases who can't comprehend the case. From the page: ""The Court rejects the test for "authorization" articulated by defendant's expert, Lawrence Baldwin. To find all access "authorized" which is successful would essentially turn the computer crime laws of this country upside down. That's untrue. The judge is trying to hang David out to dry, even when provided evidence of what actually constitutes hacking or cracking. Accessing a server on the public internet that is set up to provide that public info is not a crime, and saying that it is not a crime doesn't suddenly damage computer crime law. The judge just amended the definition of "unauthorized" to include public internet servers that were expressly configured to provide info to anybody who asks for that info."
deocanto rated 5 months ago
Legal decisions for the sole sake of law. Incredible.
smocking rated 6 months ago
North Dakota outlaws DNS. Good luck remembering IP addresses, suckers!
MarsCol rated 6 months ago
This is another case of the people administrating our country knowing nothing about the way the world works now. Seriously what didn't this judge understand about "Public Information?" Hell the guy was going up to fight spam! If that judge has an email account he knows what spam is. What a complete johnson.
jusjusjusjus rated 6 months ago
Someone here is sucking copious amounts of dick.
origin415 rated 6 months ago
I'm glad the internet is regulated by people who know nothing about it.
Kaose rated 6 months ago
An interesting bit of case law that I'll have to read up on later.
TheGift73 rated 6 months ago
Wow. Me thinks a few laws need amending quick. This case just plain stinks of stupidity on behalf of the law.
This page is not affiliated with circleid.com.