
|
SurtyrFoesmasher rated 13 months ago - Made me laugh, but then I remembered they would say "Yeah, but what about the flagellum?", which is, of course, more creationist bullshit, but bullshit designed to redirect the conversation. In the misdirection they manage to get you to forget they really haven't said anything.
Al...
|
|
8 Reviews
-
-
 snafuedem rated 7 months ago- steamloller
 scorpbia rated 9 months ago- tru dat.
 SurtyrFoesmasher rated 13 months ago- Made me laugh, but then I remembered they would say "Yeah, but what about the flagellum?", which is, of course, more creationist bullshit, but bullshit designed to redirect the conversation. In the misdirection they manage to get you to forget they really haven't said anything.
Also, in response to the review by Bennessy, at least Cryptozoologists have a couple of feathers in their hat, unlike the others you mention. You know, the coelacanth, that weird Vietnamese deer with the nostrils on the side of it's snout, and a few other animals that have only been "discovered" by science, but were known to tribes living near the creatures, in the last few decades. Remember, the gorilla was thought to be a myth, until explorers in the 19th century shot and killed one to bring back to Europe. You can discount what the majority of conspiracy theorists have to say, but just remember a cryptozoologist isn't the same kind of "animal".
 brtkrbzhnv rated 13 months ago- No, generally they'll say something like "that's not evolution; that's just a change in gene frequencies over time", or whatever.
 Anudhyan rated 13 months ago- Wow. Creationalists are following Gandhi's "Three Monkeys" advice. See no evi(l)(dence), hear no evi(l)(dence) and speak no evi... well at least they're trying...
 - glasstacular rated 13 months ago
- or they just run away and surround themselves with like minded people. truely their mind is weak.
 sirjefferson rated 13 months ago- john 3:16 for god so loved the world...
 AitrusTekis rated 13 months ago- sounds pretty fair to me.
|