Website review: Search Results - THOMAS (Library of...
wflor421 discovered this in Politics
•7 reviews since Apr 25, 2008
politics, marijuana, drugs
•thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z
People who like this website
- evandar
Cypress
- yahabra
San Diego
- tye1877
California
- MissTreats
California
- venumus
San Francisco
- bsm117532
Davis
- Bondrake
Chandler
- swissplus
Logan
- Oublei
Eugene
- whoisemjay
Colorado
StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests.
Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!
Reviews of this website
- wflor421 discovered 3 months ago
- From the page: "SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF CERTAIN MARIJUANA-RELATED PENALTIES. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no penalty may be imposed under an Act of Congress for the possession of marijuana for personal use, or for the not-for-profit transfer between adults of marijuana for personal use. For the purposes of this section, possession of 100 grams or less of marijuana shall be presumed to be for personal use, as shall the not-for-profit transfer of one ounce or less of marijuana, except that the civil penalty provided in section 405 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 844a) may be imposed for the public use of marijuana if the amount of the penalty does not exceed $100."
seafox7 rated 3 weeks ago- Write your congressman.... and if this is the first time you've ever seen the thomas.loc.gov fix that.
- YearoftheRat rated 2 months ago
- Poorly written. I spot a couple loopholes already. Plus, that's just not enough to define personal use. If this passes as-is, there will still be debates as to what constitutes personal use. As well as possession. Possession covers land, on-your-person, and storage, but what about other forms of possession? (i.e. Constructive Possession) This act is still very bare, but I admire the effort. The 'non-for-profit transfer' is a nice touch, I'll give it that. But will it cut down on crime? AhhhIdoubtit.
- jesusofdenver rated 2 months ago
- This rules. If states legalize it, especially for medicinal purposes, then the feds shouldn't be intervening. Especially, ESPECIALLY for medical purposes.
- grimmjack66 rated 3 months ago
- Use your brain...people!
Unfortunately State laws are the ones that get most people thrown in jail, and State and Local Police are the major enforcers of those drug laws. How many people get caught by Federal law enforcement with 100 grams (8 tablespoons= 1/2 cup =4 ounces =113.4 grams) or less?
This is another Jedi mind trick to make the morons on the left think their worthless representatives are doing something "cool", while actually doing nothing.
These are the drug laws in Barney Franks own State! - Use your brain...people!
- dodgecharger rated 3 months ago
- I believe Barney Frank also referred to this as the "Let's Free Up Our Prison Cells For Real Criminals" Bill. Seems very sensible.
