close
  • Main Page - SkepticWiki

    The reviewer below mistakes philosophical skepticism, which this website does not attempt to communicate, with scientific skepticism - the actual goal. There is a big difference. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism for a pretty good explanation.)

    Reviewed by prewitt81 Apr 11 2009, 09:14pm ( 3 reviews ) skepticwiki.org

  • 3 reviews
  • Reviews of the site
  • Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review! default avatar
  • Rated by prewitt81 on Apr 11 2009, 9:14pm

    The reviewer below mistakes philosophical skepticism, which this website does not attempt to communicate, with scientific skepticism - the actual goal. There is a big difference. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism for a pretty good explanation.)
  • Rated by DoctorCongo on Jun 27 2008, 12:40pm

    While I think Critical thinking is probably one of the most important concepts out there, I find that skeptics do not take it far enough. They seem to still hold to the assumption that their senses are relating an actual objective universe with zero proof of this. And I find that most people who call themselves skeptics ARE the 'habitual doubters' that the people who made this website claim not to be.
  • Rated by greenwebdesign on Oct 12 2007, 2:36am

    The Encyclopedia of Science and Critical Thinking