Find other sites about
-
The reviewer below mistakes philosophical skepticism, which this website does not attempt to communicate, with scientific skepticism - the actual goal. There is a big difference. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism for a pretty good explanation.)
Reviewed by prewitt81 Apr 11 2009, 09:14pm ( 3 reviews ) • skepticwiki.org
-
lintelotiel
lintelo...
1,331 Favs
-
shdodhy
shdodhy
1,070 Favs
-
msdos464
msdos464
33K Favs
-
Zerro
Zerro
2,873 Favs
-
Octarine
Octarine
451 Favs
-
Lolan123
Lolan123
193 Favs
-
splitbrain
splitbrain
1,164 Favs
-
Koffeinist
Koffeinist
1,726 Favs
-
eelsmann
eelsmann
3,328 Favs
-
BarakaBloke
BarakaB...
2,581 Favs
- 3 reviews
- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by prewitt81 on Apr 11 2009, 9:14pm
The reviewer below mistakes philosophical skepticism, which this website does not attempt to communicate, with scientific skepticism - the actual goal. There is a big difference. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skepticism for a pretty good explanation.)
-
Rated by DoctorCongo on Jun 27 2008, 12:40pm
While I think Critical thinking is probably one of the most important concepts out there, I find that skeptics do not take it far enough. They seem to still hold to the assumption that their senses are relating an actual objective universe with zero proof of this. And I find that most people who call themselves skeptics ARE the 'habitual doubters' that the people who made this website claim not to be.
-
Rated by greenwebdesign on Oct 12 2007, 2:36am
The Encyclopedia of Science and Critical Thinking
