Stumbler review: StumbleUpon - senorsam21s web s...
senorsam21 joined StumbleUpon on Nov 20, 2005
•27 reviews since Nov 30, 2005
stumblers
•senorsam21.stumbleupon.com
People who like this stumbler
- Xeneri
Los Angeles
- mrc015
Los Angeles
- wwhitlock
Apple Valley
- bgamall
Nevada
- davidryal
San Francisco
- Jarron
Goodyear
- ar0cketman
Socorro
- Cowboy77
Near Albuquerque
- clcallies
Hillsboro
- artsytina
Seattle
- evansdl
Arvada
- alexandraF
Denver
- jadedtales
Oak Harbor
- VRLowKey
Vancouver
- WideEyeWanderer
Texas
StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests.
Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!
Reviews of this stumbler
- judgewooden rated 6 weeks ago
- Twat
artsytina rated 8 months ago- Interesting articles and images. Love 'em! :)
- illeat rated 11 months ago
- Love your links... Will definitely be stopping by again.
- commerican rated 12 months ago
- Mark Twain is spinning in his grave.
- bgamall rated 14 months ago
- Clearly we went into Iraq to steal oil. Based on our emails you are searching for the truth about Iraq and about George Bush. I think that you are a rational guy who is weighing the facts. That is what stumbling is all about.
- stevedtrm rated 14 months ago
- www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm%3Fstory_id=9340166 Since my political awakening I have identified real world analogues to evil and to good. This article is the real world analogue to evil. It deceives in the most profoundly deep manner, and succeeds at it. The people reveiwing this article below positively have been horribly horribly deceived. It makes NO detailed formal attempt to resolve the apparent conflict in interests between wages going down and prices you pay at the store going down too.
I almost cry with rage when i read senorsam, chlim, and Aldes comments.
Aldes writes:- "Another reason economics classes should be mandatory."
This guy has actually such a feeble grasp of economics that he thinks this article has something to teach, and thinks he is learning economics because hes reading the economist.
The economist is ONLY to be admired in that it has reached the dizzying heights of being the worlds most sophisticated deceit journal. Serious students could use the economist as a model of deceit.
I sincerely suspect that he has a full time job, leaving no time or energy for focussed reflection. The economist relies on your having little or no energy left from your wage slavery when you reach this article.
The solution to the conflict presented in this article is that foreign labour DOES cause both wages AND store prices to go down, by improving competition. Now you have to compete with a guy who only gets 2 toilet breaks every 24 hours, and works 18 hours a day for less than a dollar. He doesn't have any rights, and you get to compete with him in a more competitive market. This forces wages down FASTER than prices, the average employee gets mild relief as some of his costs also go down. The net effect is still a LARGE reduction in economic freedom. The owners of the US/UK/EU economies DONT compete. They own HUGE natural resources. Their income remains the same (or greater, because wage slaves can offer no resistance to their conquest of further natural resources). yet their prices go down dramatically. The ruling class wants this to screw the workers of the world, and the core root problem is that they claim the right to own natural resources. So while you try and break some poor Chinamans rice bowl because he took your job, they build another death star to keep us all in line. and this time the death star costs $9.99 from walmart with a "made in china" label on it. - www.economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm%3Fstory_id=9340166 Since my political awakening I have identified real world analogues to evil and to good. This article is the real world analogue to evil. It deceives in the most profoundly deep manner, and succeeds at it. The people reveiwing this article below positively have been horribly horribly deceived. It makes NO detailed formal attempt to resolve the apparent conflict in interests between wages going down and prices you pay at the store going down too.
- losangelino rated 16 months ago
- "From the page: "It is widely accepted that oil is a finite resource" *** I think it's intriguing to base an entire theory on something that's "widely accepted.""
"From the page: "Could a robot have a mind? Is a dog conscious? Can a dead person feel emotion? Does a fetus think? Can a machine do something morally wrong?" *** Who the hell cares?"
I could laugh, or I could weep. - "From the page: "It is widely accepted that oil is a finite resource" *** I think it's intriguing to base an entire theory on something that's "widely accepted.""
- Codebender rated 18 months ago
- Ignorant.
- ravingpoodles rated 20 months ago
Seems to take pleasure in slagging off things he doesn't know much about. I shall use two of his favourite words to describe him: Retard. Moron.
- Longhair rated 21 months ago
- Ha, a conservative quoting Mark Twain.
Do you know anything about Twain? He was about as liberal as they come.
Anyways if your hero is glen beck, what does one expect? Intelligence? - Ha, a conservative quoting Mark Twain.
Subscribe to updates