-
I would have failed, but calculations based on bushels of wheat fitting into wagons and how much on might make off a certain amount of wheat really aren't relevant in my life in 2008. This test is a good reminder that times have changed since schools focused on the 3Rs. Some of the things... more
Reviewed by artemisluna Nov 26 2008, 11:37am ( 76 reviews ) • morehead-st.edu
-
roar84eighty
roar84e...
1,291 Favs
-
wigglyrainbow
wigglyr...
780 Favs
-
zdenton
zdenton
2,241 Favs
-
KodyJack
KodyJack
2,757 Favs
-
cartoonmoney
cartoon...
632 Favs
-
gwilmarx
gwilmarx
972 Favs
-
Huardie
Huardie
2,203 Favs
-
XxNaSaHxX
XxNaSaHxX
744 Favs
-
LUCYLYONS
LUCYLYONS
588 Favs
-
celegiki
celegiki
1,641 Favs
- Showing 53 of 76
- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by traviskovacs on Aug 29, 7:51am
I would fail...and the 8th grade was not that long ago for me.
-
Rated by clintyfresh on Aug 17, 9:41pm
HEWLETT7!!! No, but he's right. That was difficult.
-
Rated by NewYorker19 on Jul 17, 7:25pm
I fuckin' failed, man
-
Rated by wddykes on Jul 01, 6:22pm
Much of this stuff is pointless made-up categories and rules, all of it covered in classes preceding exams. Any fool could pass it if they went to school in the 19th century. it's about as interesting a question as "Could someone from the 19th century pass a test on germs, radioactivity, and computing?"
-
Reviewed by jumperstop on Jun 02, 12:13am
Long ass test
-
Rated by anti-j00 on Jun 01, 11:11pm
EPIC FAIL (for me) =(
-
Rated by MikeyBee5 on Apr 26 2009, 1:40pm
the TAKs test barley covers most of this
-
Reviewed by vapblack on Apr 25 2009, 6:34pm
I could if I attended the preceding class.
