Find other sites about
-
From the page: "So, I've taken a sampling of top stumblers, social media mavens/addicts, and people I just plain find interesting. "
Reviewed by MegT Oct 07 2007, 06:42pm ( 32 reviews ) • nowsourcing.com
-
MegT
MegT
1,614 Favs
-
nyirendac
nyirendac
2,658 Favs
-
ppk80
ppk80
9,079 Favs
-
curiousEngine
curious...
68 Favs
-
Sweet-Lemon
Sweet-L...
2,842 Favs
-
royandroy
royandroy
749 Favs
-
moffman
moffman
18K Favs
-
Kiran57
Kiran57
369 Favs
-
Wiep
Wiep
1,809 Favs
-
MeghnaK
MeghnaK
13K Favs
- Showing 27 of 32

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by curiousEngine on Jul 23 2008, 12:53am
I was writing a blog post on Big Five model personality test when I came upon this article
-
Rated by kayra on Jun 22 2008, 1:54pm
TLDR
-
Rated by drizzlein on Jun 14 2008, 6:14am
Now this article says I am madeup of top stumbler material. Let me see how I am going to perform in future. :) I am a ENTJ an executive.
-
Rated by kiribird2 on Nov 09 2007, 3:42pm
More corny b-s.
-
Rated by GotanRaider on Oct 10 2007, 7:47am
16 personalities of SU users. Cool.
-
Rated by Faz465 on Oct 07 2007, 11:27pm
Myers-Briggs? i thought it was gonna give me an opportunity to do something witty like thumb it down when it explained to me that i'm the type who thumbs everything down. anyway, pretty much no value here
-
Rated by nrkn on Oct 07 2007, 6:55pm
Personality tests are bullshit. "The reliability of the test has been interpreted as being low, with test takers who retake the test often being assigned a different type. According to surveys performed by the proponents of Myers-Briggs, the highest percentage of people who fell into the same category on the second test is only 47%. Furthermore, a wide range of 39% - 76% of those tested fall into different types upon retesting weeks or years later, and many people's types were also found to vary according to the time of the day." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers_Briggs#Criticism