|
 Luotaaja rated 5 months ago- From the page: ""I do not approve of this stuff but there is room for all sorts of different people. But anything which is going to cause damage to other people needs to be stopped."
To those who fear the legislation might criminalise people who use violent pornography as a harmle...
|
|
10 Reviews
-
-
- Luotaaja rated 5 months ago
- From the page: ""I do not approve of this stuff but there is room for all sorts of different people. But anything which is going to cause damage to other people needs to be stopped."
To those who fear the legislation might criminalise people who use violent pornography as a harmless sex aid, she responds with a blunt "hard luck".
There is no reason for this stuff. I can't see why people need to see it. People say what about our human rights but where are Jane's human rights?""
It seems like Mrs. Longhurst has a case of good old Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc fallacy...bad logic, bad legislation, bad idea. I can't understand 'violent pornography' either, but I would not ban it because of that. Also, as Lord Wallace of Tankerness points out in the article, how on earth could it be illegal to own a picture of something which isn't?
- blackman137 rated 5 months ago
- When does kinky porn become illegal?
- donthefox rated 5 months ago
- What a pile of shit. Will 2 girls 1 cup be out? Also, check out the rational and professional opinion of..... Dr Chris Cocking!!!! Bwahahahhahahahaaaaaa!!
- SheerZed rated 5 months ago
- Yet another insensitive and selfish governmental crackdown. Another erosion on our rights to personal and indeed PRIVATE cultures. Another milestone of intolerance towards the diversity of human sexuality. Universal sovereignty for all sentient beings now!
- illuminati420 rated 5 months ago
- Extreme pornography doesn't "cause" violent behavior, people that are already disturbed seek this material out, removing the material will have no effect on the cause of the problem. In fact, there will probably be unintended consequences, such as disturbed people acting on their insane violent fantasies instead of just masturbating..
- UTigaNow rated 5 months ago
-
What is extreme pornography?
As defined by the UK's new Criminal Justice Bill:
* An act which threatens or appears to threaten a person's life
* An act which results in or appears to result in serious injury to a person's anus, breasts or genitals
* An act which involves or appears to involve sexual interference with a human corpse
* A person performing or appearing to perform an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal
Must I give it all up??
- arungokhale rated 5 months ago
- ok wat they are banning like dead ppl and annimal sex.........
i could do without tht
- DaveWingnut rated 5 months ago
- This has been happening in the US since... well... Since it started. Glad you guys in the Old Country finally caught up with our insaneness.
- killmekate rated 5 months ago
- "The government is effectively walking into people's bedrooms and saying you can't do this. It's a form of thought police."
- NordeaSucks rated 5 months ago
- From the page: ""There is no reason for this stuff. I can't see why people need to see it. "
...And?
I can't see why anyone would want to attend a Britney Spears concert, or listen to progressive jazz. It doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to. Narrow-minded asshat politician..
|
