Find other sites about
-
best article I have seen explaining Ron Paul's CORRECT position on inflation in a while. OK, mises.org just earned itself a thumbs up. Finally someone explaining things as they should be explained, even if it misses an even more important point (Land ownership amounts to enslavement of... more
Reviewed by stevedtrm Sep 29 2008, 09:31am ( 34 reviews ) • mises.org
-
tinaarcilla
tinaarc...
1,522 Favs
-
dino83
dino83
1,595 Favs
-
Star-Scream
Star-Sc...
4,312 Favs
Recently online -
anonymus123
anonymu...
13K Favs
-
brooksie77
brooksie77
979 Favs
-
CEDEOTE
CEDEOTE
10K Favs
-
Zidane
Zidane
1,845 Favs
-
butimthedude
butimth...
1,023 Favs
-
blasgold
blasgold
703 Favs
Recently online -
chantaleb
chantaleb
5,828 Favs
- Showing 30 of 34

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by locomoncayo on Aug 04, 9:01pm
they're all myths, if you believe in the free market
-
Rated by thebestwalrus on Jul 14, 10:00pm
Hey LibrarianofBabel. You must be right because you have properly marginalized the people you disagree with.
-
Rated by UnicornisBryden on Apr 04 2009, 7:57pm
Great website
-
Rated by muppetcakes on Mar 17 2009, 6:43am
When the Fed artificially lowers interest rates, it does so below the market rate, which would be established at the intersection of the aggregate supply and aggregate demand of money. A rate below the market rate creates a higher demand for credit; thus people and companies get into debt beyond normal levels. On the other hand, low savings-account rates push people to withdraw money, lowering the market supply of funds. These dislocations are at the root of the eventual credit crisis, which follows the boom period that was caused by artificially low interest rates. The only way...new workers can increase their consumption beyond what they produce is through credit. Thus we return to the real culprit behind inflation: credit expansion due to central banks' intervention in the financial markets.
-
Rated by Owlsley on Jan 12 2009, 11:32pm
holy crap, get your head straight before you try to write. dependence on foreign oil is a problem when our access to a vital strategic resource can be cut off by foreign powers, such as in the case of embargoes. but those have never happened to america, right?
-
Rated by gourmety on Nov 09 2008, 10:32am
This article is disingenuous. Some of it is true, but it avoids the underlying reasons that these ideas are popularized. The simplest example is that they're assuming we want to be 100% energy independent for economic reasons. 99% of people that bring up the subject are referring to how our energy dependence adversely affects our national security. Gah!
-
Rated by LibrarianOfBabel on Nov 08 2008, 11:17am
Austrian School economics: for armchair enthusiasts, clueless middle-class libertarians and free-market ideologues who suck at science.
-
Rated by chubbsypeterson on Nov 05 2008, 9:17am
Thanks for the insight. i really enjoy when groups or individuals make difficult issues easy to understand and you do a great job of that.