Find other sites about
-
From the page: "Part I examines not only the origin of conscious experience but also how it is possible to ask of our own consciousness how it came to be. Part II examines the origin of experience itself, which soon reveals itself as the ontological question of Being. The chief premise of... more
Reviewed by chperret Nov 02 2006, 12:52pm ( 4 reviews ) • shaw.ca
-
madnicity
madnicity
4,791 Favs
-
5-on-U
5-on-U
3,821 Favs
-
bad-seed
bad-seed
5,042 Favs
-
runtime
runtime
6,540 Favs
-
arzu
arzu
3,575 Favs
-
hallucigenia
halluci...
1,434 Favs
-
nimmen
nimmen
1,779 Favs
-
moderno71
moderno71
1,216 Favs
-
TheCosmicGame
TheCosm...
11K Favs
-
koyote
koyote
826 Favs
- 2 reviews
- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by madnicity on Jan 24 2007, 5:42pm
Hermeneutics splats Existentialism. Looks like a long, interesting read.
-
Rated by chperret on Nov 02 2006, 12:52pm
From the page: "Part I examines not only the origin of conscious experience but also how it is possible to ask of our own consciousness how it came to be. Part II examines the origin of experience itself, which soon reveals itself as the ontological question of Being. The chief premise of Part I chapter is that symbolic communion and the categorizations of language have enabled human organisms to distinguish between themselves as actually existing entities and their own immediate experience of themselves and their world. This enables them to reflect upon abstract concepts, including self, experience,and world. Symbolic communication and conceptualization grow out of identification, the act of first observing conscious experiencing and intimating what it is like, mimesis, a gestural protolanguage learned through imitation, and reflection, seeing oneself through the eyes of others. The step into actual intentional speech is made through self-assertion, narrativity, and intersubjectivity. These three become the spiral of human cultural development that includes not only the adaptive satisfaction of our biological needs, but also the creativity of thought. With the mental-conceptual separation of subject and object, of self and world, the human ability to witness the universe (and each other) is the ground of our genuinely human quality. Consciousness gives human life its distinctively human flavour. It is, therefore, one and the same ability that enables us to shape planet Earth by means of conceptual representations (rather than by means of our hands alone) while also awakening us to the significance of being. Looking beyond human self-consciousness to investigate the origin and nature of awareness itself in Part 2, the heuristic limits of reductive objective materialism are found to be of little use. Direct experience also falls short in that, in order to be transformed into objective knowledge about itself, it must always be interpreted through and limited by the symbolic contexts of culture and the idiosyncratic conceptualizations of the individual. Awareness in itself must thus be considered ultimately unexplainable, but this may more indicate its inexpressible transcendence of all symbolic qualifiers than its nonexistence. It is suggested that awareness is not self-aware (as in deity) but is instead unknowing but identical with the only true universal: the impetus of creative unfolding. Our human knowledge, as an expression of this unfolding, is seen to emerge from our conscious experiencing and, in turn, to have the power and enormous responsibility of directing that experience. Our underlying symbolic worldviews are found to be autopoietic: They limit or open our conscious experience, which, in turn, confirms those worldview expectations. As we explore a future of unforeseeable technological breakthroughs on an ailing planet who patiently copes with our success, truly vital decisions about the nature, meaning, and future of conscious experience will have to be made."
