close

Discovered in

jonathan-fields

jonathan-fields
1,938 Favs

Find other sites about

Related Sites

  • Showing 14 of 16
  • Reviews of the site
  • Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review! default avatar

  • Reviewed by NickArmstrong on Aug 30, 1:24pm

    This is a dead-on analysis of exactly what's wrong with social media today. When you let the "hucksters" run rampant, you get nothing but MLM and ponzi schemes, and they wonder why they're not getting results? Morons. There ought to be some sort of way to smite the "gurus" and "experts" and get rid of the crap content beyond moving to a remote and fresh social media platform.

  • Rated by mettaseva on Nov 04 2008, 9:38am

    Social media has become marketing media

  • Rated by verneho on Apr 10 2008, 9:20am

    From the page: "We added shit to the wine and then wondered why the wine tasted like shit."

  • Rated by hnuttall on Apr 07 2008, 12:17am

    I think social media had already been killed before I got there. Naomi explains the situation well.

  • Rated by nixande on Apr 06 2008, 1:49pm

    It takes them a while, but then they catch onto you. From the page: "Now the system is screwing us. Is social media marketing dead? Of course not. Will it ever be the same again? Ditto."

  • Rated by photopreneur on Apr 06 2008, 1:05pm

    From the page: "What nobody's talking about is that youā're not doing anything wrong. The rules got changed and we didn't get the memo."

  • Rated by gzuckier on Apr 06 2008, 11:57am

    seems apropos...

  • Rated by SEPTom on Apr 05 2008, 6:07pm

    From the page: "Should I write pieces made for the front page?¯ Should I spend more time on StumbleUpon? Can Twitter seriously do my blog any good? That about Reddit? Del.icio.us? And what the hell is Sphinn?"

  • Rated by AbleReach on Apr 05 2008, 5:28pm

    Reminds me of spending too much time going through the yummy end of a potluck, while forgetting to talk to friends. From the page: "Digg made headlines in January when they changed their algorithm, insisting on a diversity requirement for submissions to succeed. Why did they do that? Because we tried to screw the system. We said, 'Hey! If I get 200 people to Digg all my stuff, I'll be on the front page every day. I'll be the Social Media King of the World!' Uh, did we seriously think they wouldn't catch on? We watered down the hooch."

  • Rated by visionpoints on Apr 05 2008, 7:06am

    Super-thoughtful post on the law of diminishing returns. We wreck what we overuse. Is social bookmarking dead?