Stumble!
Sign in for recommendations. New member? Start here

William Ayers forgotten communist manifesto: Prairie Fire

gmsc discovered 9 months agoFeatured Review
From the page: "William Ayers is a communist. But don't take my word for it. He said so himself: And not some nicey-nice peace-and-love kind of communist. Through his group the Weather Underground, Ayers was planning to "seize power" in a violent communist takeover of the Un... more
Tags: politics, communism, socialism, terrorism

11 Reviews

Characters left: 4000


Westerner1967 rated 8 months agopolitics
Now that one of his disciples is elected, let's see what happens. God help us all.
ttheg rated 9 months agopolitics
This is a very fair page. As an open-minded liberal-leaning libertarian, I see this kind of extremism as simply an understandable frustration with what our country has become. Thomas Jefferson was a communist and a terrorist by believing the dirty masses should have any say in government and supporting violent overthrow of the crown. As far as the NARC on the end, who really believes what a NARC says about anything? He has a vested interest in making them sound as bad as possible. Besides, should we ask some Palin supporters what should be done with "anti-American" blue states?
ajouie53 rated 9 months agopolitics
Great find, but it is sad that not many people will be aware of Ayers background and his real connection to Obama.
Bangui90 rated 9 months agopolitics
* Just because Ayers tries to appear respectable now doesn't mean that he wasn't a violent revolutionary in the past. In fact, as the text of Prairie Fire shows, Ayers was one of the most extreme extremists in American political history. And as the links given as the end of this essay will prove, Ayers is just as politically radical now as he was back then. He has never renounced the political views he professed in the 1960s and 1970s. The only difference is that now he no longer commits violence to achieve his goals. After his stint as the leader of the Weather Underground, he shifted to a different tactic: to spread his ideology under the aegis of academia. But the goal remains the same: to turn America into a communist nation. Ayers' contemporary writings contain many of the same ideas (and even the same phrases) found in Prairie Fire, just toned down to make them more palatable in polite society. But Where Is the Obama Connection? This essay is only about William Ayers' past and present political views. It is not about the connection between Barack Obama and William Ayers. That issue has been covered (and continues to be covered) elsewhere in innumerable news reports and blog postings. Yet as evidence mounts of the extensive and long-standing connection between Obama and Ayers, making their association more and more difficult to deny, Obama's campaign and supporters have started shifting their strategy; Sure, they say, Obama may have had a connection with Ayers, but why is that so bad? Look at William Ayers now: He's a completely respectable man. What -- he protested against the Vietnam War? So did everyone. He's no extremist. I see these arguments made in countless blog posts, comment sections, and even news articles. This essay exists to stop that political escape route. There's no getting around it: William Ayers was a violent communist revolutionary bent on overthrowing the government and seizing power in the United States. The proof is on this page. And the only difference between the 1970s William Ayers and the William Ayers with whom Barack Obama has associated is that Ayers no longer uses violence to achieve his goals. But Ayers' underlying political world-view (i.e. communism) has remained the same.
paintlady rated 9 months agopolitics
big plot to destroy America . Heaven help us
jakad rated 9 months agomilitary, seniors, politics, veterans, pittsburgh
Team Barry and Barry H Obama's surrogates say that William Ayers was only another Vietnam War protestor. BS. This guy was a communist actively supporting the enemy. Doubtful? The manifesto written by Ayers, his darling wife, and two other Weather Undergounders is here in all of its despicability.
humbleInfidel rated 9 months agocommunism, politics
Here it is folks the damning information on Obama and Ayers In Their own words!
Sneakeasy rated 9 months agocommunism, politics, socialism, liberalism
WOW! Yesterday I told you about Bill Ayer's blog. That place is a representation of his current thinking, and activities. As Lefty as it is...it's tame compared to the contents of this book that he co-wrote as a member of The Weather Underground. The Blogger known as ZOMBIE has done concerned Americans a great service by getting his hands on a copy, and beginning the task of sharing some of its disturbing contents. The thing to remember, as you read this, is that Barack Hussein Obama is a documented friend, and colleague, of this man, and we are less than 2 weeks from electing him our President. FROM THE ARTICLE: "This essay is only about William Ayers' past and present political views. It is not about the connection between Barack Obama and William Ayers. That issue has been covered (and continues to be covered) elsewhere in innumerable news reports and blog postings. Yet as evidence mounts of the extensive and long-standing connection between Obama and Ayers, making their association more and more difficult to deny, Obama's campaign and supporters have started shifting their strategy; Sure, they say, Obama may have had a connection with Ayers, but why is that so bad? Look at William Ayers now: He's a completely respectable man. What -- he protested against the Vietnam War? So did everyone. He's no extremist. I see these arguments made in countless blog posts, comment sections, and even news articles. This essay exists to stop that political escape route. There's no getting around it: William Ayers was a violent communist revolutionary bent on overthrowing the government and "seizing power" in the United States. The proof is on this page. And the only difference between the 1970s William Ayers and the William Ayers whom Barack Obama associated with is a change in rhetorical style; a re-wording of his radical philosophy to make it seem more mainstream. But the underlying political thesis (i.e. communism) remains the same."
This page is not affiliated with zombietime.com.