|
 markchenjd rated 7 months ago- I wouldn't advocate this because I think the robotics program is making great strides and it makes more sense to have them be our harbingers, but it's definitely an interesting question to think about.
One way, one person mission to Mars.
|
|
6 Reviews
-
-
- markchenjd rated 7 months ago
- I wouldn't advocate this because I think the robotics program is making great strides and it makes more sense to have them be our harbingers, but it's definitely an interesting question to think about.
One way, one person mission to Mars.
- napodano rated 7 months ago
- Taking part to a mission to Mars: $1 billion.
Planning it as a one-way mission: 50% discount.
Being the first human to live and die on Mars: priceless.
- shadowpool rated 7 months ago
- But how would you go about dying?
- tringtring rated 7 months ago
- So, what do you say, wannabe space travelers? Would you ride in a tiny spaceship to Mars by yourself to be known as the first human to go to Mars and the die there? Sounds melodramatic, but no, thank you very much!
- dollabling rated 7 months ago
- this is basically horrible.
going solo to mars, no way to return.
can't they just send like three ppl?
the more the merrier!
- Maxismax rated 7 months ago
-
Would you go on a mission to mars? What about if it was a one-way mission? And you were by yourself? Yeah, that changes things a bit. Well, that's exactly what former NASA engineer Jim McClane suggests, saying that it's worth considering and removes many of the hurdles keeping us from the red planet now.
|
