close

Discovered in

Supercalifragali

Supercalifragali
130 Favs

Find other sites about

Related Sites

  • The Journal of 9/11 Research and 9/11 Issues

    I call bullshit. Directed energy doesn't go outward in all directions. You'd need a system which continued the destruction keeping pace with the fall. And a correctly varying angle of attack. And then you've got the squibs. One of Wood's presentations talks about... more

    Reviewed by ntltrmllgnc Jul 01 2008, 07:37pm ( 7 reviews ) • drjudywood.com

    116 views
  • 5 reviews
  • Reviews of the site
  • Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review! default avatar

  • Reviewed by stevedtrm on Jul 10, 6:57pm

    Im afraid I agree. I think shes a fraud, probably a government disinformation agent. Dont have time to prove it im afraid. All sorts of wacky non credible stuff on here though. Take a look at her aluminium glow chart. follow the link to the website it came from.

  • Rated by Laukev7 on May 17 2009, 6:28pm

    Total fraud. Dr. Judy Wood promotes the Directed Energy Weapon, which is utter bollocks. How does that account for the red-grey nanothermite chips found in the dust? And why use DEW, when thermite gives more predictable results, and is easier to use than advanced technology that would require highly specialised people likely to betray the perpetrators or refuse to carry out the plan. This nonsense is addressed here: http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200702/Implausibility-Directe d-Energy-Beam-Demolish-WTC-by-Gregory-Jenkins.pdf http://www.journalof911stud ies.com/volume/2007/Fe-DustStudies44.pdf http://www.journalof911studies.com/v olume/2007/ProfScottJFK,911,andWar.pdf In addition, Dr. Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds, the so-called 'dynamic duo', have teamed up to smear Dr. Steven Jones. Morgan Reynolds is a former Bush regime official who pushes the 'no planes' theory, as if a bunch of criminals willing to demolish three skyscrapers and murder 3000 people would have the consideration to spare 4 planes and its passengers and a handful of patsies. Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.

  • Rated by Tigana on May 16 2009, 2:18am

    Looks like the greatest destruction in NYC and DC on 9/11 may have been due to HAARP or something very like it. Many things may have been going on at once. The planes would then have been just one tool or a distraction or focus for the audience while the magus played his tricks. Don't just focus on the buildings - look at the cars...

  • Rated by wintersolsticed on Dec 25 2008, 12:24pm

    DISINFORMATION BULLSHIT!

  • Rated by ntltrmllgnc on Jul 01 2008, 7:37pm

    I call bullshit. Directed energy doesn't go outward in all directions. You'd need a system which continued the destruction keeping pace with the fall. And a correctly varying angle of attack. And then you've got the squibs. One of Wood's presentations talks about velocity instead of acceleration. There are two reasons the collapses registered less than expected. Firstly, it's plain to see that the last floor contributed the least energy. If all that weight were concentrated in a cube and dropped the result would have been a higher rating on the Richter scale. The other reason is that some parts of the building came down separately since they'd blown outward.