Website review: Three Words Tha...
starspirit discovered this in Physics
•15 reviews since Apr 24, 2008
physics
•discovermagazine.com/2008/may/02-three-words-...
People who like this website
- jjjohnstone
North Hollywood
- kevinryanmooney
Los Angeles
- rurandy69
Downey
- ichoose
San Diego
- nic54n
California
- ar0cketman
Socorro
- 91KP
Rifle
- Phayder92889
Puyallup
- OkiePC
Colorado
- jordan4
Seattle
StumbleUpon is the best way to discover great web sites, videos, photos, blogs and more - based on your interests.
Everything is submitted and rated by the community. Discover, share and review the best of the web!
Reviews of this website
- thegnome54 rated 31 hours ago
- Uh... no one knows how gravity works, either. Oh, or the strong and weak forces. I'm seeing a pattern here. NO, WE DO NOT HAVE ALL OF THE ANSWERS YET. Jeeze.
Zigphroid rated 3 weeks ago- Everybody knows that magnets work my sending out gravatons and graviolies to act on other objects! Also causing time travel when combined with microwave ovens and supernovas. Sesh didnt anybody watch this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roswell_That_Ends_Well
- polveroj rated 3 weeks ago
- When unapologetic unwillingness to give up macroscale intuitions meets quantum field theory, someone's bound to get hurt.
- voiceofgod32 rated 8 weeks ago
- Three Words That Could Overthrow Physics: â€oeWhat Is Magnetism?
- Baldrin rated 2 months ago
- This guy is full of shit.
- AttemptingReason rated 2 months ago
- I was under the impression that field theory was invented to deal with this very problem. The force on an object is determined by its state and the state of the EM field at its location, and changes in the field propagate at a finite speed (the speed of light). In this model, everything is a local effect: either one spot of the EM field affecting its neighbors, or the em field at a certain point effecting an object at that point. Is the idea of a universal EM field not accepted as a literal phenomenon?
- Lambdoid rated 3 months ago
- Are virtual photons not a good enough explanation? I haven't noticed anyone in the particle physics world arguing vociferously against it. When you get down to the subatomic level, we have to come up with increasingly abstract concepts and invent new terminology because our minds are not very well equipped to deal with such things.
