close

Discovered in

Find other sites about

Related Sites

  • Showing 19 of 27
  • Reviews of the site
  • Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review! default avatar

  • Rated by awesomealias on Nov 08, 11:35am

    That's not a champagne glass, dipshit.

  • Rated by tommy-sean on Sep 04, 9:16pm

    Flaneuse schooled those in the use of statistical sociology. Many people on this SU forum seem have trouble grasping the point of this graph aswell. I wonder if they're mostly followers of the "social-darwinism" theory. That said, Prole is right on.

  • Rated by kevinryanmooney on Jul 08, 7:40pm

    wtf? this "graph" doesn't even give an x-axis designation. worthless.

  • Rated by bird603568 on Jun 21, 10:59am

    thanks captian obvious. no matter how the the money is distributed, the richest 20% is alway going to have a decent amount more than the 21-40%. Also im willing to bet money that if you are reading this you are probably in the top 20%. with earths population of ~6.8 billion that leaves about 1.36 billion per section. Coincidentally, The rough population of Europe + the US + Canada + Japan is about 1.4 billion. Who would have guessed that pretty much the whole developed world holds most of the money?

  • Rated by kornkid010 on Jun 20, 11:01am

    This is not a champagne glass

  • Rated by aisarin on Jun 18, 12:33am

    when have i cared about this?

  • Rated by Ultrasarah on Jun 17, 3:27pm

    yah it's the better than it was years ago ... but it's still wrong. i'd bet that very few people in the top twenty percent do work that warrants them such a big salary.

  • Reviewed by toriahennesey on Jun 17, 12:12pm

    For all those bitching about this graph - if you have a bank account - you are that top percentile.

  • Rated by Torchiest on Jun 16, 7:26pm

    Utter nonsense.