Find other sites about
-
A dissappointing individual with a very good and frequently thoughtful blog. "That's right slaves, it could be worse, therefor you should never complain about anything, now back to work." A highly valuable stumbler, who, like myself understands the importance of being... more
Reviewed by stevedtrm Oct 23, 07:15am ( 197 reviews ) • stumbleupon.com
-
clownassasin
clowna...
1,421 Favs
-
narelleelinore
narell...
243 Favs
-
chosen173
chosen173
2,451 Favs
-
Hira0000
Hira0000
3,702 Favs
Recently online -
IsraGeek
IsraGeek
3,943 Favs
-
raloo
raloo
1,077 Favs
-
MonicaPaste
Monica...
1,021 Favs
-
Chadrew
Chadrew
6,812 Favs
Recently online -
Badshaped
Badshaped
22K Favs
-
ankaka
ankaka
1,260 Favs
- Showing 147 of 197

- Reviews of the site
-
Join StumbleUpon or login to add a review!
-
Rated by DGTGDGCG on Nov 01, 8:05am
"I would love to strap these assholes to a chair clockwork orange style and cycle lolcat images until they laugh, and smash a fucking toe with a hammer for each one." -- Best line ever.
-
Reviewed by the-fair on Oct 24, 6:46pm
It has always bothered me that stumbleupon says we are "Two of a kind" with 72% likeness factor.
-
Rated by stevedtrm on Oct 23, 7:15am
A dissappointing individual with a very good and frequently thoughtful blog. "That's right slaves, it could be worse, therefor you should never complain about anything, now back to work." A highly valuable stumbler, who, like myself understands the importance of being brutally honest with people. I am curious to hear his entire explanation of what froced him off stumbleupon. If he's right, a respected individual like this could cost stumble dearly in terms of quality of content, in that his opinion of what makes a good social networking site is taken seriously by people like me. I unhappily noticed when SU changed their "flagging" system to include "hostile", which can be used be bad people to highlight those who would criticise them, and "vulgar" which is more about presentation than content. I thoroughly decry the widespread assumption that people on social networking sites have the right to be potected from accurate detailed and devastating critique. I see it on a few social online networks. If someone has an accurate, detailed and devestating critique about someone else, that critique is all the more important for the progress of humanity as a whole to see errors in character and develop away from them. Either way, I like innomen a lot. Update:- I like innomen. After a long conversation its become clear that this guy, while still clearly head and shoulders above average American cattle, is not even close to brilliant. His use of words and understanding of implications is woefully inadequate and he can't discern outrage from irrational insecurity as a result. He made all sorts of unfounded accusations and wildly innaccrate criticisms of me against me after making this mistake including a couple which were obviously simply products of his neglect after I took the time to pre-empt one explicitly and another where he made claims of a condition attached to an admission of a near trivial mistake I made that wasn't to be found anywhere in our text. Innomen asserts, probably truthfully, that he cant publish a response on stumbleupon any more. Therefore he is unable to respond to my assertions in the public way I have promoted them. He has denied me permission to post his response here, although my offer still stands to publish here unedited, in full, or link to it here if he so consents. When I have time I'll be posting here my judgement of the credibility of his reasons for refusing to allow permission to publish his response.
-
Reviewed by heatdunn on Oct 09, 10:05pm
From the page: Being benevolent should be the highest priority. hmm.
-
Rated by misnualready on Oct 08, 10:23am
Definately a controversial stumbler, a man who is not afraid to speak his mind and I definately respect that!