witney1003

Harrowing.

Interesting article. I have a few things that leapt to mind.
I have to say I find it odd that this article hasn't cirulated wildly - and it should - both sides of the argument are entitiled to their opinion.

On the other hnad I personally did not see the quoted content for the alleged e-mails as that earth shattering or as proof of some massive cover -up.

To me they appeared to be a lot of sounding off and personal opinion. Precisely why, I assume, these types of private communications are supposed to remain as such. Those who listen at keyholes usually hear something unpleasant about themselves.

I also note no dates on the e-mails quoted in the article. I would be interested to see where in the timeline on climate change information they have come - the understanding and accumulation of knowledge chnages rapidly by the day - new explanations or data is always being released. So I wonder how dated some of the questions posed or mused over in these e-mails is.

I am not ready to trash the huge volume of scientific evidence and data about global warming on the strength of a few private e-mail exchanges.

A good blog to follow important issues.

Promising new technology to recycle co2 emissions back into fuel. Hope they get the investment push to move this technology forward.

A sad testament (but not one we didn't already know) is that economics, not quality of care to meet patient's needs, is what drives the health system.

To think that genetic tests which could determine the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of drugs for individual patients, and help make their treatment more specific and useful, becomes a matter of whether there's any profit in it.

Terrific snapshot of bikes as delivery and transportation vehicles.

Well, the battle of the sexes even extents to whose urine is better?

Gardening with urine.