close
thegipples

Last seen: 20 hours ago

thegipples is a 28 year old guy from Portland, Oregon, USA

Interests: the human animal, words, music, not movies, Portland, politics, various others. But every nook has its cranny.

20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 100 | 120 | 140 | 160 |

  • Psychopathy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Op-Contributor - Why We're Still Happy - Op-Ed - NYTimes.com

    Rated Dec 27 2008 1 review psychology nytimes.com

    From the page: "when everyone from autoworkers to Wall Street financiers becomes worse off, your life satisfaction remains pretty much the same.

    ...many people would prefer to receive an annual salary of $50,000 when others are making $25,000 than to earn $100,000 a year when others are making $200,000.

    ...people would give up money if doing so would cause someone else to give up a slightly larger sum. That is, we will make ourselves poorer in order to make someone else poorer, too.

    Findings like these reveal an all-too-human truth. We care more about social comparison, status and rank than about the absolute value of our bank accounts or reputations."
    Op-Contributor - Why We're Still Happy - Op-Ed - NYTimes.com
  • Deferred gratification - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Rated Oct 23 2008 4 reviews psychology wikipedia.org

    The marshmallow experiment: "In the 1960s a group of four-year olds were tested by being given a marshmallow and promised another, only if they could wait 20 minutes before eating the first one. Some children could wait and others could not. The researchers then followed the progress of each child into adolescence, and demonstrated that those with the ability to wait were better adjusted and more dependable (determined via surveys of their parents and teachers), and scored an average of 210 points higher on the Scholastic Aptitude Test."
    Deferred gratification - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • BibliOdyssey: Brain Maps
  • The Creative Personality | Psychology Today
  • Mind Hacks: Finally, APA bans work on war on terror...

    Rated Sep 22 2008 1 review military, psychology mindhacks.com

    From the page: "Despite the psychiatric and medical associations' immediate and unequivocal ban on their members' participation in 'war on terror' interrogations, the complicity of medical staff is widely reported.

    The fact that APA membership is optional for many psychologists and that most of the contested interrogations occur in secret or closed facilities means that disciplining individual psychologists will remain difficult at best.

    However, the ban will mean that the APA will find it difficult to show any public support for the role of psychology in interrogations, and, perhaps more importantly, to make explicit organisational links between the psychologists' governing body and the US intelligence services.

    Some have speculated that the two years of APA heel dragging suggest a more chummy relationship with the military than has been admitted publicly and this new ban may be a bigger blow than is obvious if this turns out to be true."
    Mind Hacks: Finally, APA bans work on war on terror interrogations
  • APA Petition result

    Rated Sep 22 2008 1 review military, psychology apa.org

    From the page: "Members Approve Petition to Limit Psychologists' Work in Some Detention Settings

    PRESS RELEASE

    APA Members Approve Petition Resolution
    The petition resolution stating that psychologists may not work in settings where "persons are held outside of, or in violation of, either International Law (e.g., the UN Convention Against Torture and the Geneva Conventions) or the US Constitution (where appropriate), unless they are working directly for the persons being detained or for an independent third party working to protect human rights" was approved by a vote of the APA membership. The final vote tally was 8,792 voting in favor of the resolution; 6,157 voting against the resolution. To become policy, a petition resolution needs to be approved by a majority of those members voting. "
    APA Petition result
  • Important work can be done while daydreaming - The Boston...

    Rated Sep 01 2008 8 reviews cognitive science, psychology, daydreaming boston.com

    From the page: "Although there are many anecdotal stories of breakthroughs resulting from daydreams - Einstein, for instance, was notorious for his wandering mind - daydreaming itself is usually cast in a negative light. Children in school are encouraged to stop daydreaming and "focus," and wandering minds are often cited as a leading cause of traffic accidents. In a culture obsessed with efficiency, daydreaming is derided as a lazy habit or a lack of discipline, the kind of thinking we rely on when we don't really want to think. It's a sign of procrastination, not productivity, something to be put away with your flip-flops and hammock as summer draws to a close.

    In recent years, however, scientists have begun to see the act of daydreaming very differently. They've demonstrated that daydreaming is a fundamental feature of the human mind - so fundamental, in fact, that it's often referred to as our "default" mode of thought. Many scientists argue that daydreaming is a crucial tool for creativity, a thought process that allows the brain to make new associations and connections. Instead of focusing on our immediate surroundings - such as the message of a church sermon - the daydreaming mind is free to engage in abstract thought and imaginative ramblings. As a result, we're able to imagine things that don't actually exist"
    Important work can be done while daydreaming - The Boston Globe
  • Findings - Deep Down, We Can't Fool Even Ourselves -...

    Rated Jul 01 2008 1 review politics, psychology, morality, hypocrisy nytimes.com

    From the page: "â€oeAnyone who is on â€our team†is excused for moral transgressions,” said Dr. DeSteno, a psychologist at Northeastern University. â€oeThe importance of group cohesion, of any type, simply extends our moral radius for lenience. Basically, itâ€s a form of one personâ€s patriot is anotherâ€s terrorist.”

    If a colored wristband is enough to skew your moral judgment, imagine how you are affected by the â€oeD” or the â€oeR” label on your voting registration. If you are a Democrat, you are more likely to think Mr. McCain hypocritically switched tax policies to pick up conservative votes, but Mr. Obamaâ€s decision to abandon public financing probably looks more complicated. If youâ€re a Republican youâ€re likelier to figure Mr. Obama did it just so he could raise more money on his own, but youâ€re more willing to consider Mr. McCainâ€s economic rationales.

    "
    Findings - Deep Down, We Can't Fool Even Ourselves - NYTimes.com
  • Premium content | Economist.com

    Rated Jun 29 2008 2 reviews psychology economist.com

    From the page: "Ask two people to answer a question like â€oehow many windows are there on a London double-decker bus” and average their answers. Their combined guesses will usually be more accurate than if just one person had been asked. Ask a crowd, rather than a pair, and the average is often very close to the truth. The phenomenon was called â€oethe wisdom of crowds” by James Surowiecki, a columnist for the New Yorker who wrote a book about it. Now a pair of psychologists have found an intriguing corollary. They have discovered that two guesses made by the same person at different times are also better than one."
    Premium content | Economist.com