stevedtrm/writing

WIKIPEDIA IS A CORRUPT MEDIA ORGANISATION DEDICATED TO SPREADING REASSURING LIES THAT NOTHING IS WRONG IN THE WORLD AND CONSPIRACIES THE US GOVERNMENT DOESNT ADMIT NEVER HAPPENED.

From the page: "I have never been good at small talk. I go to suburban parties and feel out of place. I feign interest. I stifle a yawn. I want to ask you to tell me dirty things about your sex life. I want to argue with you about the existence of God. Instead, you smile with chemically whitened teeth and pass me a tray of appetizers. Iâ€m not interested in where you purchased the smoked gouda. I want you to put down your platter of cheese, pick up your shirt, and show me your scars. How else am I suppose to learn about the world if not by the map of your body, the tight fist of your skin? Clothing is just a pretty camouflage.



I want to feel things. I want to know things by proximity, by the way something bends or resists against the palming of my hand. I want to lean my head to your mouth and feel your words hot on my collar. I want your whispered breath rotten in my ear. Tell me your secrets.



I have Celtic blood that makes me certain I was a sin-eater in another lifetime, or maybe I was the goddess Tiazolteotl, purveyor of filth and lust. Iâ€d squeeze you wicked between my thigh muscles and make you cum, then whisk away your sin in a hot bath of afterward absolution.



I am not offering you absolution here or now. What I want is certain and more selfish. I want to know that you feel as much as I do, that you too have carried hurt like a belly full of stones.



So, can we just bypass the small talk? I want every single one of you to just give me your dark. I want access to the things that make you sweat in the silence of your night time.



I need to know if your fear is anything like mine"

Superb. Well worth watching. 11mins in - how do you get all the opinions the same - in Russia we have to tear journalists fingernails out to do this. Whats the secret?

Intellectual female.

I love dedication to soveriegn integrity.: "The manuscript was rejected by twelve publishers before a young editor, Archibald Ogden, at the Bobbs-Merrill Company publishing house wired to the head office, "If this is not the book for you, then I am not the editor for you." "

Just about anything about or by Orwell is worth reading.

I think, sometims, that Greening and Bazant are both professional liars: "Greening:



"It looks to me like you are the one having trouble explaining what was actually observed that day! I think you need to get out of your classroom more often and take a look at real world problems. . . . these phenomena are what need to be discussed and evaluated, not your classroom physics.



Chandler:



"[Classroom physics] aka correct physics."



Greening:



"Newton's 3rd Law applies to bouncing billiard balls not the interiors of collapsing buildings ........"



Chandler:



"Someone should sue your professors for malpractice."



Greening then goes on to provide a lengthy and complex explanation, which I will spare you, of why Newton's third law does not apply in a falling building, but, no matter how long and clever, it must be spurious as the third law is truly universal. We see here that Greening is not seeking enlightenment in this dialogue but is trying to muddy the waters. He persistently promotes arguments which are not logical but have the appearance of being logical, in which so much complexity is presented that it is hard for the public to discern the errors. The morality of such activity is open to question.



Either Greening is attempting to deceive for his own purposes or he is unable to understand the principles involved in Newton's third law. Either way his publications must be regarded as untrustworthy. It also follows that the work of Bazant must be regarded in a similar fashion, as they were co-authors in a particularly controversial paper.



crono911.net/docs/Bazant2007.pdf [crono911.net/docs/Bazant2007.pdf] "