Radical US psychiatrist says mental illness is not a...
Rated • 1 review • activism, health, psychology • guardian.co.uk
"There is something unique, he suggests, about the individualism and self-help philosophy that permeates American culture, making it particularly conducive to advocacy of the rights of patients - or consumers, as they are commonly called in the US. "I know I shouldn't generalise, but it is a bit old world, new world," he says. "The culture we live in here that people [outside the US] don't understand is that we are very self-help and peer-support oriented." Despite all the progressive changes to mental health care in Britain over the years - from the closure of large asylums to moves toward a recovery model - Fisher contends that activists in the UK have been too "tame"." - RAPatton
"Not only does he reject the notion that people cannot recover from serious mental illnesses, he rejects the term mental illness. "We don't believe that description is helpful. In fact, we think it's harmful - not only in terms of stigma and discrimination, but also in terms of recovery, because it focuses the person's own attention and the people around them on the wrong issues. It focuses on: 'You take this pill and be compliant, and you listen to the doctors.'" What matters, he says, is the kind of support people get when they need it most. "It's unfortunate that the first message people hear when they are in acute distress is: 'You have incurable brain disease.' That takes a long time to undo. The first thing that people hear should be: 'Yeah, you're in distress, but other people have been in that [state] and there's hope, and you can heal.' If people heard that, many more would recover. Medicine is a tool, but it's not the primary tool."" - RAPatton




