prosaicproduce

several points did not make sense and are just incorrect. is this person familiar with psychology at all? selection bias? seriously?

seriously? mac vs. pc humor? still?

annoying descriptions of the photos

as someone familiar with kanji and chinese characters, this is extremely reaching and inaccurate. if the character for the devil actually had a basis in christian mythology, wouldn't it make more sense for there to be a radical for snake instead of man? this is what happens when you try too hard to find a link that is simply not there.

thank god this article didn't mention that stupid left-brain, right-brain, "if you can see it go both ways you're a genius!" bulllllshit.

don't know a lot of specifics about this study but it seems like there are many possible confounds. preschool children are young, but they are likely not so young that they would have never encountered a negative reaction to a snake either on television, books or by their families.

"psychology" is not synonymous with preachy self-help advice

i'm sick of this left-brain right-brain bullshit